I Went to the Wrong Table on a Blind Date, and the Real Goddess Asked Me to Take It

The best science fiction movies of the year

Samsung Food The author of this book has changed since Chapter 94, and the style of the book has been separated to an unbearable degree. The first one hundred chapters are actually the most successful part of this book. Sweetness does not rely on forcing the plot, but is slowly revealed through details: daily interactions, subconscious preferences, and the heroine's almost 100% trust in the hero. This kind of trust is not a line of dialogue, but is established through repeated choices, so readers will naturally assume it and default that this relationship is "stable." But here's the problem - there are obvious gaps in the character's character in the later period. As soon as her classmates appear, the heroine becomes suspicious and hesitant. This change may be explained by the setting, such as external pressure and information asymmetry, but it is fragmented in terms of reading experience. Because the first hundred chapters portray a person who gradually opens up his heart and firmly trusts the male protagonist, but the later chapters seem to be "reset" into a person who is easily influenced and insecure. This is not growth, but regression. Readers will feel that all the foreshadowing emotions are weakened and even a bit "sweet". The real poisonous point is focused on the kidnapping plot. The first is a matter of logic. The phone and bag fell to the ground. Where does the positioning come from? Then why not use it before? . In fact, you can use more natural methods, such as burying shared positioning and device tracking in advance, or even simply using real-world technology, which is more reasonable than adding abrupt settings. Secondly, there is the inconsistency between the villain's motivations and his actions. Now that it has developed to such extreme behavior as kidnapping, the villain's purpose cannot be just to "scare." But the plot didn't dare to really let things happen, so it became a very embarrassing state: the danger was written out, but the consequences were avoided. This will cause readers to feel intense discomfort, because once they enter this scene, everyone will naturally think the worst, but the author does not bear the logical consequences of this setting. The core issue is actually how to use the system. In the early stage, there is almost no reliance on the system, and it relies on character relationships to advance. This is originally an advantage. But at a critical moment, when the system suddenly comes to the rescue, it will make people feel that this is a "plug-in that only exists when needed." The setting of the system is essentially part of the rules of the world. It must be used from the beginning or not used at all. The current method of "not using it at ordinary times but only using it at critical moments" will directly destroy the sense of immersion. If we change it, the direction is actually very clear. Or follow the reality flow: bury the details of safety and trust in the early stage, and rely on the male protagonist's judgment, actions and preparation to save people at critical moments. This way the logic is closed and it is more realistic. Either follow the system flow: completely integrate the system into the plot, such as turning it into a guardian or dog food mechanism, providing early warning, providing positioning, and assisting decision-making, so that the male protagonist can be prepared before the crisis comes, instead of temporarily cheating. As for the emotional line, if there is enough intimacy and interaction in the front, then the heroine should not be easily shaken later. A truly mature relationship is not that there are no misunderstandings, but that when misunderstandings arise, the first reaction is still "I believe you." If this point can be maintained, the tone of the entire book will not collapse.