Return

The principle of this car is that when gallium is used as a catalyst, aluminum and water can release hydrogen. However, the publicity is not in place and the public has found a black spot. This is to explain it clearly and no one will take it seriously. If you don't explain it clearly, trolls will come to your door. What is particularly sad is how many people are excited about the topic of water turning into oil, thinking that they have absolute true knowledge, and do not really understand the principles behind its false propaganda. Because the true principles are not topical, this is the media dominating science and technology public opinion. This technology currently has no civilian value because the prices of aluminum and catalysts are too high, but it has high military value. Unmanned underwater vehicles can last with aluminum batteries. As an otaku who can only write science fiction novels, I admire people who can actually make things.

Regarding the collider experiment, I think I am not qualified to say whether I support or oppose it. Because of this theoretical verification, there is a lot of high-energy physics behind it. If you don't understand it, you will not understand it. As an author, out of your own interests, you should not get involved in controversial topics. But as a person in scientific research-related industries, I think I should say: There should not be any reason to oppose the construction of the collider. If the collider wants to grab funds, other scientific research projects must stand out clearly. Standing in the public eye means taking responsibility for the output of this project to be higher than that of the collider. Any application for funding comes with risks. But there is no risk in hiring someone else's mouth to negate other people's applications. Because if you don't do anything and don't guarantee, you can't make a mistake. Waiting for the scientific research funds prepared by the state to be approved becomes the responsibility of the state. And public opinion curbs collider funding, and there is no need to be responsible for the failure of funding in other fields to produce results! This is the worst competition for scientific research funding. Public opinion ends up opposing the construction of a certain scientific research project on the grounds of funding, which is wrong in attitude. Scientific research bears not only profits, but also the morality of civilized exploration! The great affairs of the country lie in military service and sacrifice. Emphasize the opposition between scientific exploration and people's livelihood! Public opinion says that scientific research affects people's livelihood is overstepping the bounds. That is a financial responsibility, and the media should do a good job in popularizing cutting-edge knowledge. Instead of pretending to be an expert to discuss projects to earn traffic. I have personal experience. I fell ill one day in college and felt that the class was too tiring, so I stopped going for the time being. Once that was justified, I could skip the entire semester. Because it is wrong to think that attending classes and physical health are mutually exclusive. If you are sick, you should follow the procedure and specify in writing the number of days of sick leave. Today we oppose the collider because of productivity, and there will be more opposition projects in the future, because our current social system has begun to increasingly restrict productivity, and soon more projects will be rejected by us using productivity. Europe has no money. They can't even build nuclear fusion or the Galileo satellite chain. The United States has announced that it will return to the moon, and there is also a funding problem. They all began to abandon the civilized attitude and began to hunch over and calculate. What kind of exploration attitude should we give to the next generation? Follow others carefully. It's better to move forward calmly. Even if you fall or fail, you are the one who fell first.

The first two lives were okay, but starting from Chibai, the plot started to drag for some reason. Also, let me complain about why there is no female protagonist. . .

Well, don't add too many tasks to the protagonist. Sub-ruins are inherently tragic. It's miserable enough. Don't put more burden on him. The protagonist can do as much as he can. But this book is not a tragedy but a joyful novel, and it is passionate from beginning to end. The protagonist of this book takes a very special path. In addition, I'll put it first. No matter where I write, don't send me razors. I won't accept them.

I seem to have seen a novel about nuclear-powered battleships before. Can any book friend tell me what's going on? Why is there only this one?

Good book,,,,,,,,,,,,

In addition, now is really not the time to gloat over misfortunes. When the last fig leaf of the lighthouse is taken off, it is the time to become crazy. The country has already begun to break the rules internally. Could the next foreign policy be French? Sihua. If this trend continues, and the United States has two more presidential terms, it is really possible that something extreme will happen beyond our imagination.

In the future, high school physics textbooks will have one more knowledge point

If you are reborn once. If you pursue calculating other people's excellent intelligence. That shows that you like tactics very much. Doesn't this work exist? What is written here is freedom. Be educated. Be disciplined. Be restrained. This is not allowed and that is not allowed. Eventually he grew into an honest person. If only I could live again. Don't care about other people's opinions, don't worry about the ridicule from the outside world. Don't be stupid if you make the past mistake. This is a kind of freedom. A boy doesn't want to be controlled too much. Just make sure the general direction is right. For other things, just move forward.

Girls' brains develop quickly, which is very fatal. Because when the high school entrance examination is in junior high school, the brains of boys and girls are absolutely different. During that period, girls generally had higher intelligence than boys. Learn faster and better, be able to learn. You will find that most of the students admitted to college are girls. You can check the ratio first and you will know. Others say that during that period, if you fell in love, the probability of boys was higher. Their brains were not fully developed and their self-control was not strong. And once you fall in love, your performance drops rapidly. Girls don't have this shortcoming. He can fall in love while still maintaining a decent level of performance. The same cannot be said for boys. Once they fall in love, they will be ruined.