Xueba's Black Technology System

Um. I don't know how I, a girl, could finish reading this book. I was confused about the basics and looked nb-like. I saw that the main character was single based on his ability and didn't have many romantic partners like other male-video books, so I just wanted to keep reading. Hurry up and update. I'm exhausted after reading this. . . .

When I saw this book, the title was quite attractive to me, The Black Technology System for Academic Masters. What kind of black technology is that? This really made me curious. It started with "The mascot at the door fainted." At first glance, I thought it was a story about the male protagonist fainting and traveling through time and obtaining the system. However, I read on... This is a super invincible cheat. Then, I started to be confused... Male protagonist, I understand that you have a plug-in, but I don't understand this mathematical formula. Why does it look like kaomoji to me! I really looked up to the sky and shed a thousand tears, and then there were all kinds of theories. It was really a "black technology system for academic masters"! I said, male protagonist, how about you use this system for me? A liberal arts student cannot afford to be hurt. . And the most poisonous part of the article is that I obviously can't understand it, but I keep wanting to read it. It's really poisonous! The novel made me fall in love with learning and never ran away.

There is a cheat in the cliffhanger of the academic master's life! Lu Zhou, from the 985 Department of Mathematics. Although he is not a genius, he can still be regarded as a talent on the surface. He does not kill people or get angry and is officially certified as a good citizen. After a part-time job fainted, the development of a top student began. The system was kind and kind and loving like an aunt, and 985 students became a kindergarten class. However, this is not a problem. Regarding the difference between me and the top student, While he was reading [New Lectures on Mathematical Analysis] and [Advanced Algebra], I was reading The Boss on my phone. The top student always knew what was going to be tested in the next class, but after finishing the exam, I took the previous textbook and turned over the answers. The top student read the book to find the value coefficient, but I only cared about whether I could pass... The difference between me and Lu Zhou is that, I'm not handsome enough to have a domineering female classmate ask me questions (but there are handsome guys). He calculates in his head, and I may not be able to come up with the correct answer even if I draft it. On Lu Zhou's journey to becoming a top student, girls were not as important as studying, but I was still hanging up on the road to graduation. Quotations from Lu Zhou: A true academic master does not need interpersonal relationships! I say a few strokes and a few paintings, but you say life is a little pleasant. What is the significance of the existence of world technology? Explain system coke? The law of conservation of mass is facing unprecedented challenges. The academic master's system is so dark that even Coca-Cola looked at me with contempt (ignorant Pepsi-Cola, Coca-Cola). ... [Bookid]21449273[/bookid] Everyone is working hard in places you can't see, even top students, so what reason do we have to be lazy? There is no inborn achievement, only down-to-earth success can be achieved Lu Zhou's life seems to be on the hook. He has been working hard, trying to do everything well, and exploring unknown objects in the unknown world. There is no absolute cheat. Even if he was chosen by black technology, Lu Zhou has reached this point on his own. After all, as the saying goes, "No one will waste energy to save a person who wants to die." Even though Lu Zhou later created many miracles, he still did not stop exploring science. He was still studying and making contributions to mankind. Back to the beginning: "A top student who doesn't apply what he has learned is not a true top student." ... After watching Xueba, I understood certain things and saw the world clearly. The reason why the system is dark is because the host is not simple. We always treat opportunities to choose us, but never take action We always complain that God is unfair, but we never think about making efforts Fate is fair, it's up to you to seize the opportunity and create your own unlimited possibilities. So My classmate is the best Make progress together

I have a lot of experience with the previous chapters. I have participated in both mathematical modeling and American competitions. I feel that the author knows this field very well and must have participated in it, at least in the national competition.

Take a small amount of students in a test tube, add excess homework, dissolve, and filter to obtain top students and poor students. Add a large amount of test papers to the top students. The top students will have no obvious change. Add a small amount of test papers to the bad students. All the bad students will dissolve and produce a large number of bubbles.

Before the 21st century, one of the most famous conjectures in mathematics was the four-color conjecture. Many people may have heard that to dye any map (on a plane), adjacent countries must have different colors, and only four colors are enough. Enough to dye the map with four colors This conjecture was formally proposed in 1852, but it had actually been widely circulated before. Many mathematicians have tried to approach this conjecture from various angles and have also proposed various wrong proofs. Finally, more than a century later, Appel and Haken proved this conjecture with the help of computers. However, because the proof mainly relies on computers, it is still not very clear why four colors are enough. We can equivalently convert the four-color conjecture, or the four-color theorem, from "map" to "graph". A graph, loosely speaking, is a graph formed by points and edges. In graph theory, there is a definition called a plane graph, which means that a graph can be drawn on a plane and the edges do not intersect each other. We regard each country on the map as a point. If two countries are adjacent, it means that there is an edge between the two points. In this way, we get a planar graph, and coloring countries becomes coloring the points in the graph so that adjacent points are different colors. The four-color theorem says that for any planar figure, four colors are enough to satisfy the above conditions. Many erroneous proofs of the four-color theorem originate from the following erroneous observation: Many people think that if four colors are needed to color the points of a graph, it must be because a certain area of ​​the graph contains four two-by-two adjacent points; similarly, if five colors are needed, it must be because a certain area of ​​the graph contains five two-by-two adjacent points. Next, we only need to prove that a graph with more than or equal to five points connected two by two cannot be drawn on a plane, and the proof is complete. First of all, it is true that a graph with more than or equal to five points connected two by two cannot be drawn on a plane. (In graph theory, a graph with n points adjacent to each other is called an n-order complete graph, denoted as K_n.) I have seen various long arguments about this point of view on Zhihu. In fact, it can be explained clearly in one sentence: through Euler's formula, a planar graph with n points has at most 3n-6 edges. Bringing n=5, we get at most 9 edges. However, a fifth-order complete graph has 10 edges and is therefore not a planar graph. So if a picture does not contain a fifth-order complete picture, can it be dyed with four colors? We consider the weakened case, but the principle is the same: if a graph does not contain a third-order complete graph, i. E. A triangle, must two colors be enough? Here's an easy counterexample. Does not contain triangles, but requires at least three colors This tells us that trying to discuss in terms of the size of the complete subgraphs contained in the graph is the wrong direction. In fact, Erdos constructs a graph that does not contain triangles (and certainly does not contain other complete graphs greater than third order), but requires an arbitrarily large number of colorings. So, what is the force that drives a picture to require many colors to dye it? This seems like a natural question, but people don't know it yet. Therefore, the problem of coloring numbers of graphs has always been one of the focuses of research in mathematics. But people have some conjectures about this that seem correct and are just waiting to be proven: such as Hadwiger's conjecture. This conjecture is also one of the most profound conjectures in combinatorial mathematics, and it should also be one of the least likely to be proven in the short term. Before introducing this conjecture, let me briefly introduce an important concept introduced by Robertson and Seymour: Graph Minor. In fact, it is very similar to the Minor of the matrix. A small graph H is a minor of a larger graph G if and only if we can get H by deleting some edges and vertices of G and shrinking some edges of the graph G, as shown in the figure. Contraction of one edge Now, graph minor itself has become a research focus of graph theory, and mathematicians also believe that graph minor is a correct research object. The reason is mainly due to Kuratowski's theorem. Kuratowski's theorem gives us the structure of a planar graph. A graph G is a planar graph if and only if any subgraph of the graph G is not homeomorphic with K_5 and K_{3,3}. Wagner slightly generalized this theorem, which is the common form of Kuratowski's theorem: Kuratowski's Theorem The graph G is a planar graph if and only if it does not contain K_5 and K_{3,3} as Minor Robertson and Seymour successfully generalized it to any graph: a graph G can be embedded in a surface with genus g if and only if it does not contain a graph in mathcal{F}_g as a Minor, where mathcal{F}_g is a finite set of graphs determined only by g. The successful proof of this theorem convinced mathematicians that graph minor is the correct language to describe the structure of graphs. Finally, let's return to the coloring issue of the graph. As we just mentioned, many people mistakenly believe that a graph that does not contain a k+1-order complete graph as a subgraph can be dyed with at most k colors. We also give a counterexample to a pentagon, which does not contain a complete graph of order 3, but cannot be 2-colored. But maybe we're not that far from the truth: Hadwiger's Conjecture If the graph G does not contain a complete graph of order k+1 as a Minor, then the graph G needs to be dyed with at most k colors. Just replace "subplot" with "minor" and an erroneous observation becomes a profound conjecture. Since people think graph minor is the correct language, many people think Hadwiger's conjecture is correct. However, the progress of conjecture is very slow: k=1,2 Obviously. K=3 Hadwiger, 1943 k=4 is the four-color theorem, 1976 k=5 Robertson and Seymour, 1993 kgeq6 Mathematicians know nothing about the case greater than or equal to six.. If Hadwiger's conjecture is true, it means that people have roughly understood the general structure of any graph. Going back to the counterexample of the pentagon mentioned at the beginning: The reason why the pentagon does not have triangles but requires three colors is probably because it contains triangles as Minor. Pentagon contains triangle as Minor The color number of a graph has always been something that mathematicians want to understand but are difficult to understand. The four-color conjecture gives everyone an opportunity to start with the structure or topological properties of the graph. Mathematicians want to prove the Riemann Hypothesis because the inference of the Riemann Hypothesis is really useful. Mathematicians want to prove that the four-color conjecture does not really involve dyeing the map with four colors, but wants to figure out the relationship between the dyeing number and the structure of the graph. However, Appel and Haken's computer proof cannot tell us the desired results, which is why everyone is a little disappointed with this proof. So far, there is no proof of the four-color theorem that does not rely on computers. Therefore, the relationship between the color number and structure of a graph, along with Hadwiger's conjecture, is not yet an area that people's current intelligence and technology can explore.

Not to mention the fictitiousness, just for these more than 1,500 chapters, the fact that it can maintain a high score of 8.0 Points is already a good indication of the quality of the book. Let me say one more thing, this book is very long, and you will understand it naturally if you understand it. Next is the text. Some people say that at this point in a hundred years, writing has collapsed, so why not read it? [Yes, I came here to increase semen] I like it. No matter what you say, Lu Zhou did not embark on the path of black technology because of the concerns some people say. How he does it, how do I see it! The author has his own considerations in how he writes. The author is very bold, and for this reason, he attracted my attention more than the choice of ending the book just like that. A hundred years later, this point can give readers a trembling pleasure. When I saw it, it really aroused my curiosity again. Thinking boldly, will the economy really decline rapidly in a hundred years? The impact of this foundation [forgive me for not thinking of other good words] on future generations is worthy of our deeper thinking - or that sentence - and worthy of our bolder imagination. If we just finish the story without writing about this "hundred years later", we may just think about the protagonist's great achievements and achievements for thousands of generations. The author thinks this way, probably because of his seriousness and love.

In fact, I read this novel intermittently. When I read the first few dozen chapters, King Bi did not drift away after obtaining the system. He was more attentive to learning than most people, and he was also serious and responsible towards his apprentices (at that time, he was only forced by financial problems). The competition was not afraid of the opponent just because he was in a school that was better than his, but he tried every means to defeat them, even though one of them later became his student. When Lu Biwang was an undergraduate student, he went to Princeton to prove twin prime numbers on-site and graduated early. Later, when he went to Preston to study for a doctorate, he did not give up any opportunity to witness history because he was systematic. Maybe it seemed that he was too pretentious. After graduating from the doctorate, he became a professor and did his best for his students. Not only in the field of mathematics, but also in the research of physics and chemistry, especially electrochemistry, he was particularly attentive and worked hard to experiment and find the research results of He-3. Although I don't understand the professional terminology, I don't regard receiving the award as the ultimate goal. Later, a lot of efforts were made to prove the Kakutani conjecture, study Lu manifolds, and study high-temperature superconductivity. He won the Fields Medal and the Nobel Prize at the same time, and then also invested in the research of nuclear fusion rockets, moon landing projects and Mars bacteria. In order to prevent it from being discovered that it was not the biology he was really studying, he chose to publish anonymously without publishing his real name. After working in the aerospace field, he also studied mathematics. Even if world-class professors refuted him, he was not afraid to use his strength to prove himself at mathematics conferences to express himself; he dared to be bold in front of authorities. Poaching people; when facing the invasion of hackers from a certain country, he just discussed the matter and used the existing AI to actively face it. Xiao Ai did not reveal his true identity when discussing with the hackers; when a certain country had doubts about lithium battery technology and the problem of Beep charging, he did not hold on to the 7-year-old patent and was criticized by public opinion. King Lu Bi hid for a few chapters but did not appear but gave them a slap when he appeared. In addition, in order to participate in IMO, he also brought up military power. King Lu Bi relied on his connections The president saved a soldier in exchange for national defense; Vera fainted at the International IMO and was diagnosed with terminal lung cancer. King Lu Bi, probably because of his promise to her a few years ago and won the Fields Medal, was with her, so he tried to use cutting-edge cryonics technology and imagination of the future to use human cryonics; as well as carbon-based chip technology, improved virtual reality technology and collaborated with many famous scholars at the same time to solve the unification of algebra and geometry. It shocked the mathematical world and explored the outside world in the void. Star civilization, quantum computer research broke the world computing speed record, the increase in particle mass in physics and the discussion of the theory of consciousness of the universe spirit (moving towards new physics at the expense of Professor Milo), the holographic system took the initiative to attack the Japanese who wanted to cheat China. A strong counterattack proved the strength of the Chinese people, and showed that pretending to be cool also requires strength. Although many of them are cheats, at least after the cheats, they devoted themselves to academics instead of being called heroines. This makes me admire Although it is impossible to have system plug-ins in the real world, Biwang's attitude towards scientific research is still worth learning from. I often stay up late to read books, but as a science student, my lack of knowledge reserves leads to some academic obstacles in reading. In fact, I don't expect any results. Treat the next 500 days with King Lu's attitude toward academics. Although you can't pretend to be cool, you should be down-to-earth.

Because the author updated too little, many readers were dissatisfied. From today on we raise the banner of uprising against the author. Our slogan is: Breaking news! Breaking news! ! Breaking news! ! ! Brothers, stand up.

This is the first online article about academics that I have read. For someone like me who is a book picker, I am very lucky that the first one I have read can be rated as a classic. It also gave me the idea of reading other articles about academics. Except for the emotional line, which is a little redundant for me, there is a lot less theoretical verification in the middle and later stages of the book. Maybe I shouldn't embarrass the author too much. But I still feel that the sudden appearance of new technologies is a bit abrupt, and there is not even a process, just like fast forward. Maybe the inspiration and imagination are almost exhausted, or maybe I want to have a tight pace to bring the book to a climax. All in all, for me, the second half is a little less exciting than the first half, but it is much better than some 🔥 after which the content quality plummets. Above Recommended for readers who like imaginative and non-novice texts. If you have any good books, please leave me a private message to recommend them. Thank you.