I Loaded the God System in the Anime

I feel like the writing is not very good. When I read the part about joining the club, I felt like an incompetent person who wanted to show his sense of existence. He could only say one sentence and it would be over if he didn't join, but he insisted on giving a lofty speech. Do you think it reads well? Feel free to add your own opinions and thoughts, and then defend yourself a few times. Do you think you are noble? Have you helped others point out problems? Or does it mean that the protagonist no longer regards other people as human beings?

To use an analogy. Just say Shizuka Hiratsuka. Let the protagonist join the club side. It seems a little too intellectual and too venomous. It seems that he is arguing with reason, but there is too much nonsense. Others want the protagonist to join the club, and then the protagonist starts to quarrel with others. Some of the things said are simply speechless. This is saying all the offending words for no reason. If someone invites you to join a club, you can simply refuse. The protagonist starts to talk eloquently based on this. How about this? How about that? What are your strengths? Are you worthy? Can you do it? Let's not talk about other people's abilities. As for the protagonist, he is not likeable. He has never firmly refused, making it seem like there is a chance for others to ask him to join. As a result, they begin to deliberately expose the shortcomings of others. The protagonist's identity at this time is that he is a bad student, and he is not very popular in school, and his popularity is not good. What qualifications do you have to say such a thing? Without a system, even if you have the memory of having money for 20 years, it's still nothing. It's not like a person who can't speak will not be of great use wherever he goes. That part was really speechless. The point is that it reminds me of a group of professional trolls. Say one sentence worth 10 sentences. Tsk tsk tsk, at first I thought there was no problem. Looking back later, if I go, you don't think you are really arguing, right? It's a small thing that adds a club in itself. The author abruptly wrote a criticism meeting. The protagonist is the one who criticizes others. The more I write, the more speechless I am. How come it's like this? Simply.

The whole article is full of poisonous points and has no interesting points at all.

The writing is incomprehensible, and I can't tell what the author actually wrote.

The character reproduction was too poor. I thought she had high poison resistance, but she actually made Yukino a nymphomaniac girl, and Leng Qingbingshan was made into a nymphomaniac in just one or two sentences? Funny, right?

It seems that three options are given, but in fact there is only one with the worst reward that can be chosen, and there is no mention of the penalty for not choosing. Don't be so cliche and force the choice, okay. I hope there will be a plot in the future where you can choose from all three options without choosing, and do several options at the same time, etc. Also, write the protagonist's outlook on life better so that he looks like a person who grew up under a red flag. From the plot I've seen so far, I feel that the outlook on perspective is really too old-fashioned. Only books written four or five years ago would have such a two-dimensional perspective. The same three views as 💩.

Are you still writing? The eunuch will not end well

Fishing today I found a good book That's it 5⭐stop

The character's personality was too poorly recreated. I thought she had high poison resistance, but I actually wrote Yukino as

The story of Rikka and Yuta in Qiuqiu Plus One Chuunibyou, the author I will give you a monthly vote