
I Have a Cultivation Assistant Ai
About This Novel
I don't believe that this world was created by gods and Buddhas. I believe that there are objective and real laws of heaven above the sky full of gods and Buddhas. Therefore, gods and Buddhas cannot cover my eyes. Zhang Donghai, who traveled to a different world to cultivate immortality, started his path to immortality with such a materialistic world view. Immortals, gods and monsters, ghosts and elves, all things arising from thoughts, magical powers with fingers... No matter how bizarre the world is, he always insists on viewing the world from a materialistic perspective. External elixir method, inner elixir method, food and health preservation, taiyin refining method, corpse dissolution method, immortalization method..., No matter how obscure and difficult the various paths to immortality are, he always interprets them with materialism. For such a brain-burning thing, fortunately, he has an AI to accompany him in interpreting various rules of the world and deconstructing all kinds of weirdness. PS: 1. There is no fairy spirit in this book, only wisps of human spirit; 2. This book is not "scientific". If it involves "science", it is just to have an underlying logical support. 3. In terms of traditional Chinese medicine and pharmacology, this book is quite serious. 4. The character in this book is by no means a perfect person, so please do not criticize him harshly. His later fights for the interests of all living beings were just out of the rational emotions of normal people. 5. Warning, book lovers who like the dark style should be careful! Book friends who hold vastly different views should not waste your time!
What Readers Think
Rating
Community(0)
Official(2)Scraped 10d ago
Explain
The materialism in this book does not refer to the existing "science", at least it does not refer to the "science" in most people's minds, because for many people's subconscious, scientific concepts still remain on the stability and certainty of the macroscopic world, and on simple concepts such as the conservation of energy within a system. And if science really follows the direction of materialism, then the current "science" should be in its infancy. Needless to say, if we regard the current "scientific research results" as the basis of our worldview, it will definitely limit our thinking. Just like the birth of human beings, how has current science ever studied and understood it? Is it just a little bit of "water" from the father's sperm and mother's egg plus a genetic concept that gave birth to the mysterious and complex human body and human spiritual consciousness? What is the operating logic behind it? I'm afraid modern science is no longer able to discuss it any further. Therefore, the materialism mentioned in this article is not the current science. The materialism mentioned in this article only refers to the objective reality of the world. Run logic.
Tsk, it's not a Taoist practice, there's so much earthly atmosphere
Rating
Community(0)
Official(2)Scraped 10d ago
Explain
The materialism in this book does not refer to the existing "science", at least it does not refer to the "science" in most people's minds, because for many people's subconscious, scientific concepts still remain on the stability and certainty of the macroscopic world, and on simple concepts such as the conservation of energy within a system. And if science really follows the direction of materialism, then the current "science" should be in its infancy. Needless to say, if we regard the current "scientific research results" as the basis of our worldview, it will definitely limit our thinking. Just like the birth of human beings, how has current science ever studied and understood it? Is it just a little bit of "water" from the father's sperm and mother's egg plus a genetic concept that gave birth to the mysterious and complex human body and human spiritual consciousness? What is the operating logic behind it? I'm afraid modern science is no longer able to discuss it any further. Therefore, the materialism mentioned in this article is not the current science. The materialism mentioned in this article only refers to the objective reality of the world. Run logic.
Tsk, it's not a Taoist practice, there's so much earthly atmosphere









