Love in the Time of Cholera
by K
About This Novel
One of the important classic literary masterpieces of the 20th century, it is known as "one of the love novels in human history". Love in the Time of Cholera is a novel written by Garcia Marrs after he won the Nobel Prize for Literature. It tells a love epic that spans more than half a century and exhausts all possibilities of love: loyal, secretive, rough, shy, platonic, fleeting, and dependent on life and death. Mars once said: "This is my best work, a creation from my heart." In Colombia at the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century, crazy love was as rampant as cholera. At the funeral of Dr. Urbino, who died unexpectedly, his wife was extremely sad, but received an unexpected guest: her former lover Florentino appeared and told her that more than half a century later, he was still waiting for her. It all started with an accidental glance many years ago. The young operator Florentino fell in love with Fermina at first sight, and the two made a private life. However, they were opposed by Fermina's father, and Fermina left him feeling the emptiness of their love. More than fifty years later, he finally had the opportunity to declare his unchanging love again.
What Readers Think
Rating
Community(0)
Official(30)
Many people say that this book has "three views". In fact, I want to say that this is human nature. What you can't get is always restless. And he just wants to tell us a truth. Just because something is easily obtained does not mean that it can be easily given up.
A book and love that is not surprising
After reading it, there was no surprise or excitement, it was as calm as water. Worldly, helpless, lustful, the voice of the heart. Fifty years later, still holding hands together is already fate I really don't appreciate the hero and heroine's attitude towards life. The heroine's final performance may be true to herself, but compared to her doctor husband, she is already insignificant and insignificant.
Not only is he the oldest and most prestigious doctor in the city, he is also the most elegant person in the city. However, his sharp wit and sophisticated way of using his famous name prevented him from getting the love he deserved.
Love determines sex, sex does not determine love. Sadly, materiality, objectivity and ethics have locked up most love
It is the pure pursuit of the spirit of love, abandoning all ethics, materiality and objectivity. The only thing you are saying is that you cannot accept physical betrayal. Desire is instinct and love is subjective. If you love someone without any distracting thoughts, do you require someone who loves you more than you ask for to reserve eternal physical loyalty for you? Why do the male protagonists have so many women? It is a deformed change of longing for love and being unable to get it. They place love on the comfort of sex. The male protagonist never gives up the pursuit and purity of love. People who care about sex, please think about it carefully. Your love will always be within ethics. There is nothing wrong with it. The pattern is small. Love will never disappear. What you think disappears is just that love has never existed. All the sadness is nothing but the damage to your pride caused by loss and abandonment. All the loss, miss and abandonment of love are nothing more than the inability to transcend ethical and objective limitations. The male protagonist's love for the female protagonist is a constant pursuit, and he has never loved anyone else, retaining the loyalty of love for the female protagonist. The heroine is unworthy, she hurts two men, her love is unfaithful and selfish.
I have 622 lovers, but the one I love is still you? ? ? ? Scumbag! ! ! ! ! ! Scumbag
Come, come, be healthy and happy
Check it out in the comments!
Many years ago, someone asked me what the difference is between novels about prosperous times and novels about troubled times. I just said, "Those stories in which the whole world abuses the protagonist, or the protagonist is almost destroyed for the sake of the world, are troubled times novels; those in which all kinds of dragons are proud of the sky, and the whole world revolves around the protagonist, are prosperous times novels."
The introduction is shocking
I don't want to read the text, no matter how good the writing is, how ups and downs the plot is, or how delicate the emotional descriptions are. Just because I personally feel that the three views of this book are incorrect.
? ? ? ?
I really can't stand this article. It's hard to imagine that the author is the one who wrote One Hundred Years of Solitude. Perhaps the only person who has more scenes in this article is the heroine who is pure (clean?) (Physically)? In the end, the male protagonist (I really don't want to admit that he is the male protagonist of this article) really doesn't know what to say. Is it enough to love someone spiritually? In the end, he raped a teenage girl when he was still a grandfather. Is this a crime? In the end, it indirectly led to her suicide. The heroine's husband also cheated on a woman, but he was ten thousand times better than the hero. The hero also wrote a special record of the women he had slept with. I read the physical book, and I couldn't help but want to complain about it here.
It's hard to understand
I was halfway through the book when I accidentally saw a book review and found out the ending. The mood is very complicated, and it is obviously very different from what I understand about long-term love. The description of the whole book is understandable. This is a great book. It is about life and aging. The height of thinking is unprecedented and profound. . Yes, it depends on the national culture. Emotions are not universal.
Rating
Community(0)
Official(30)
Many people say that this book has "three views". In fact, I want to say that this is human nature. What you can't get is always restless. And he just wants to tell us a truth. Just because something is easily obtained does not mean that it can be easily given up.
A book and love that is not surprising
After reading it, there was no surprise or excitement, it was as calm as water. Worldly, helpless, lustful, the voice of the heart. Fifty years later, still holding hands together is already fate I really don't appreciate the hero and heroine's attitude towards life. The heroine's final performance may be true to herself, but compared to her doctor husband, she is already insignificant and insignificant.
Not only is he the oldest and most prestigious doctor in the city, he is also the most elegant person in the city. However, his sharp wit and sophisticated way of using his famous name prevented him from getting the love he deserved.
Love determines sex, sex does not determine love. Sadly, materiality, objectivity and ethics have locked up most love
It is the pure pursuit of the spirit of love, abandoning all ethics, materiality and objectivity. The only thing you are saying is that you cannot accept physical betrayal. Desire is instinct and love is subjective. If you love someone without any distracting thoughts, do you require someone who loves you more than you ask for to reserve eternal physical loyalty for you? Why do the male protagonists have so many women? It is a deformed change of longing for love and being unable to get it. They place love on the comfort of sex. The male protagonist never gives up the pursuit and purity of love. People who care about sex, please think about it carefully. Your love will always be within ethics. There is nothing wrong with it. The pattern is small. Love will never disappear. What you think disappears is just that love has never existed. All the sadness is nothing but the damage to your pride caused by loss and abandonment. All the loss, miss and abandonment of love are nothing more than the inability to transcend ethical and objective limitations. The male protagonist's love for the female protagonist is a constant pursuit, and he has never loved anyone else, retaining the loyalty of love for the female protagonist. The heroine is unworthy, she hurts two men, her love is unfaithful and selfish.
I have 622 lovers, but the one I love is still you? ? ? ? Scumbag! ! ! ! ! ! Scumbag
Come, come, be healthy and happy
Check it out in the comments!
Many years ago, someone asked me what the difference is between novels about prosperous times and novels about troubled times. I just said, "Those stories in which the whole world abuses the protagonist, or the protagonist is almost destroyed for the sake of the world, are troubled times novels; those in which all kinds of dragons are proud of the sky, and the whole world revolves around the protagonist, are prosperous times novels."
The introduction is shocking
I don't want to read the text, no matter how good the writing is, how ups and downs the plot is, or how delicate the emotional descriptions are. Just because I personally feel that the three views of this book are incorrect.
? ? ? ?
I really can't stand this article. It's hard to imagine that the author is the one who wrote One Hundred Years of Solitude. Perhaps the only person who has more scenes in this article is the heroine who is pure (clean?) (Physically)? In the end, the male protagonist (I really don't want to admit that he is the male protagonist of this article) really doesn't know what to say. Is it enough to love someone spiritually? In the end, he raped a teenage girl when he was still a grandfather. Is this a crime? In the end, it indirectly led to her suicide. The heroine's husband also cheated on a woman, but he was ten thousand times better than the hero. The hero also wrote a special record of the women he had slept with. I read the physical book, and I couldn't help but want to complain about it here.
It's hard to understand
I was halfway through the book when I accidentally saw a book review and found out the ending. The mood is very complicated, and it is obviously very different from what I understand about long-term love. The description of the whole book is understandable. This is a great book. It is about life and aging. The height of thinking is unprecedented and profound. . Yes, it depends on the national culture. Emotions are not universal.
