What the Celebrity Wife Hates is My Vest, Not Me

Urgent update! You can't just do one chapter a week, it's a lifetime series.

Just like the evaluation, some illogical descriptions

Note: I only evaluate it from three perspectives, which does not mean that the book is not good. . . The more I think about this book, the more I think about it. I have never read a novel like this. I have wrong views but I think I am right. For example, Wang Rengui is a man who occupies a pit and does not shit. Generally speaking, this kind of character should be a negative teaching material. Not only is this not the case, but he is also a positive character, the kind who can be the father-in-law of the male protagonist. . . In this book, it seems that the male protagonist is a scumbag at first, but in fact, after reading the whole story, I feel that he has the most upright views (but he is also comparative) and hooks up with famous ladies. But who among these people is not the King of the Sea? Everyone gets what they need, not to mention that the male protagonist also wants to survive (don't call me a doghead to save my life, ps. I am a female). Apart from the previous emotional experiences, the male protagonist has nothing (actually there is, but I am too lazy to say it). The second is the female protagonist. If in reality I would definitely not like this kind of person, but I appreciate the two-way dedication of the female protagonist and the male protagonist. So I'm not criticizing this, but the heroine's view of "my people must be right, and those who I think are bad must be bad" are really crooked. Because I always feel that I shouldn't look at people through colored glasses. Does the person I like, my relatives and friends, have to be perfect? Similarly, if I don't understand someone I don't like, why should I accuse them? Then there is the father of the heroine, he is an airborne master, the kind of person who is the most annoying to ordinary people, like me, who occupies the toilet and does nothing. And he does nothing every day. Although the author tries hard to clean up his situation and says that the atmosphere in his department is the best, who would like a leader who is a bit ambitious and does nothing? It's okay to have incorrect three views, but the author uses facts to show that the three views are wrong, and uses writing to show that others' three views are correct, which is extremely weird. Others, such as the heroine's company agent, the heroine's company boss, the heroine's best friend, and other people in the heroine's family, all have problems with their outlook. Except for the boss, I'm not sure, but everyone else is a positive character. So where is the blame? It doesn't matter if the three views are crooked, but the author insists on giving the crooked views a positive and righteous appearance, as if he thinks these people have upright views, which makes people feel uncomfortable.

The first fifty or so chapters are really interesting. Please don't be a eunuch. If you become a VIP subscriber or something later, I will read it too.

The production team's donkeys are not as slow as you. The updates are too unstable. Do good books need eunuchs?

The purpose of this book is: to conceal one's identity.

The male protagonist works in a television station, and he also writes novels and scripts, and some of his scripts have been made into TV series or movies. It's a bit unreasonable not to know celebrities in the entertainment industry. It's okay if you don't recognize the little star or the 18th-tier star. The protagonist's job is already outside the entertainment industry.

Mainly because I think the name Wuxiang sounds really nice. There's nothing wrong with giving it five stars, right? It's just too much trouble to add a comment

Fast forward the two people recognize each other, I want to see the river of blood flowing

Really good, blood flows like a river, blood flows like a river