Three Kingdoms: I Can Edit the Script

If you have any suggestions or questions about my plot, you can mention them here. I will try my best to improve them. Please bear with me as a new author😭

Although there is a lot of romance in it, and even some gamification, and mistakes in historical common sense are not uncommon, but overall it is really well written. I have to say something here, what the hell is Emperor Lie? Based on the development of the protagonist Liu Cong, if he can conquer Jiangdong, occupy Jingyang, stand on three pillars and proclaim himself emperor, and finally have his grandson to reunify, the protagonist's lowest temple title and posthumous title cannot be lower than Liu Bei's. Liu Bei is the [Emperor Zhaolie], the ancestor of the Han Dynasty. The ancestor is because Liu Bei founded Ji Han, and he is indeed the founding emperor. Zhaolie is the evaluation of his life. The protagonist's achievements are greater, and he finally became the founder and founder of the Three-Hung Han Dynasty, so he must be the ancestor. If there is no unification, [Zhongzu] will definitely not be worthy, but [Xuanzu] and [Xianzu] will have no problem As for the posthumous title, according to the custom of the Han Dynasty, the single-character posthumous title of the successor king is preceded by the word "filial piety", such as: Xiaowen, Xiaowu, Xiaoxuan, but this is not necessary for the founding emperor, such as Liu Bang's Gao, Liu Xiu's Guangwu, Based on the achievements of the protagonists, Zhaowu, Xuanwu, Zhangwu, Shaowu, Wuxiang, Wulie, Wumu, Wuning, Wuyi, these are all possible. The author is only one [Han Liedi], which is completely inconsistent with the posthumous title system of the Han Dynasty. As for if the protagonist finally succeeds in reviving the Han Dynasty and reunifying it, and [Emperor Shizu Guangwu] Liu Xiu occupies the temple name of Shizu and the posthumous title of Guangwu, the protagonist can basically only be [Emperor Zhongzu Guangwen] Of course, the protagonist must make huge historical contributions, such as the creation of the three-province-six-ministry system, the imperial examination system, land tax reform and a series of eternal achievements, to be worthy of this posthumous title. Otherwise, if Guangwen cannot be given, and Guangwu is used again, we can only use secondary mixed posthumous titles such as Wucheng, Wuhuan, and Wuming. However, as the protagonist is a time traveler, these reforms are almost necessary, and the most likely one is [Emperor Guangwen] I really can't stand this [Han Lie Emperor], because it can only be the abbreviation of the posthumous title of the succeeding king. For example, Emperor Wen of Han and Emperor Wu of Han are the abbreviations of Emperor Xiaowen and Emperor Xiaowu. But who has ever seen Emperor Guangwu of Han referred to as Emperor Han Guang? No? When we call Liu Bei, he is also Han Zhaolie Emperor, not Han Lie Emperor. I hope the author will think about it carefully.

The update is great. I owed one update yesterday. I will make up for it today. I need three updates. I beg you not to owe more updates. I am afraid that the more you owe, the more you owe.

This is the best Three Kingdoms travel story I have ever read. The author's new book Ma Di is also very interesting. I really love your book.

Water experience water experience water experience water experience water experience water experience water experience

Your golden finger script is not good. It is very good if it is controllable. The script must be written in a way that is different from the reality experienced by the protagonist. It is so disgusting. What attracts me is this setting. You made it like this. It is quite poisonous. The more you go to the later chapters, the fewer people will comment on it. I guess you are tossing it away.

Xinye is to the north of Xiangyang. If you haven't conquered Xiangyang, you generally wouldn't go to Xinye.

After a month, I saw for the second time someone who regarded the temple name of the Liu clan of the Sanxing Han Dynasty as "Zhongzu". This shows that the author has done some research on temple names, but I don't know why the subscription collection does not look ideal. I will take a look first.