Daming: I Can't Kill Such a Greedy Prince-in-law?

To tell a joke, the number one scholar does not require a palace examination, the marriage is recognized by the royal family, and the son-in-law has never met the emperor or the empress.

To be honest, according to Zhu Yuanzhang's character in history, he would not investigate carefully. If he embezzles, the protagonist will be gone long ago. He will not see whether your results are good or not.

In a small border county in the north, there is both a night market and a stock market. Are there that many people? They also build cement roads and so on. They are even more awesome than Jiangnan Provincial Government! Even more powerful than Jinling City. Does the author know what happened to the north by the Mongols at the end of the Yuan Dynasty? 🤮🤮

Zhu Yuanzhang forced many heroes to death. However, no matter how talented the time traveler who helped him is, he will not die. Even if he does not die, he will still live. As long as someone says that you are greedy, you will be killed.

The cost of the cannon is two to three hundred thousand taels, which is just a guess. Selling for one million taels is really speechless. Do you think one million taels is worth one million yuan now?

He doesn't even recognize his father-in-law after only three years! The number one scholar must have tried it before! My father-in-law must be impressed!

Doesn't Ouyang Lun know Zhu Yuanzhang? What kind of logic, Ouyang Lun is already a consort, who has never met his father-in-law?

Who came up with the idea of ​​the number one scholar becoming the consort? The only number one scholar in history who became a prince-in-law made the matchmaker hate him so much that he wanted to kill him whenever he got the chance.

I have nothing to say after watching this. Zhu Yuanzhang is like a local ruffian. He just wants to kill people regardless of reason. Does he think that the protagonist is a corrupt official because of trivial things? He is the emperor, not sb

In ancient times, there was no currency depreciation. There were only fluctuations, such as years of disaster and years of good harvests. Metal currency has its own value. It is not that the current currency is credit currency, which is over-issued every year. Ancient currency can increase the variety of items along with the overall progress of social science and technology, which means the total wealth of society increases. It would be good if it can keep up with this growth without appreciating in value. After all, China is short of silver and copper, and what is developed and refined has not been consumed as much. In ancient China, there was not enough currency for a long time, so it devalued. Later, with the advent of the modern Age of Discovery and the discovery of the Iwamiyama Silver Mine in Japan, silver devalued due to the influx of large amounts of South American silver and Japanese silver. Copper coins have never devalued, and China's own silver production will never depreciate. So where does this argument about money devaluation come from? It has not been experienced for thousands of years in ancient times. Isn't it nonsense for you to tell him this?