Probability of Death 2\u002f2
by H
About This Novel
The child of a famous Japanese baseball player was kidnapped and the ransom was as high as 10 million! Yoshiki Takeshi racked his brains to deal with the kidnappers, but was led by his opponents from one phone booth to another... Why didn't the kidnappers show up? Is there a bigger conspiracy hidden behind the high ransom?
What Readers Think
Rating
Community(0)
Official(1)Scraped 16d ago
Shoji, you are not suitable for the social faction...
I actually like Shimada Shoji's unconventional, rigorous and unreasonable water-filled essays. On the contrary, this kind of social topic ➕ unwatered middle chapter is really not suitable for him... How should I put it, there is a little twist near the end, but it seems to be no difference. For the family members and the police, it may mean a lot whether the principal is the principal or the accomplice, but for the readers, this is essentially the same crime method, except that the accomplice does the work for the principal (because the accomplice obeys the principal's orders, this specific reason will not be spoiled). In short, this reversal is off the mark for readers. It seems a little interesting, but not much. And this socialist topic is also a bit, well, there is not enough foreshadowing at the beginning, and it does not give readers equal room for reasoning. Instead, it seems like a setting is added at the end.
Rating
Community(0)
Official(1)Scraped 16d ago
Shoji, you are not suitable for the social faction...
I actually like Shimada Shoji's unconventional, rigorous and unreasonable water-filled essays. On the contrary, this kind of social topic ➕ unwatered middle chapter is really not suitable for him... How should I put it, there is a little twist near the end, but it seems to be no difference. For the family members and the police, it may mean a lot whether the principal is the principal or the accomplice, but for the readers, this is essentially the same crime method, except that the accomplice does the work for the principal (because the accomplice obeys the principal's orders, this specific reason will not be spoiled). In short, this reversal is off the mark for readers. It seems a little interesting, but not much. And this socialist topic is also a bit, well, there is not enough foreshadowing at the beginning, and it does not give readers equal room for reasoning. Instead, it seems like a setting is added at the end.
