People in the Song Dynasty Were Lawless

I have only read a few chapters, and I prefer logical books. The protagonist, as a person who answers questions, always answers questions that are not asked. He can always answer questions that the ancients did not ask or would not ask at all. It is comparable to a God's perspective. The biggest problem is that everything that should be explained by the narration is stuffed into the protagonist's words. An exaggerated description is like someone telling the protagonist that you are dead, and then the protagonist starts to say, "Yeah, I remember," and then retells every second of his life from birth to death like a running account.

It seems very contradictory. The characters in the novel repeatedly emphasize the need for historical objectivity, but the history in the novel is full of the author's subjective extremes. According to the plot of the novel, it is too rigid, but based on history, it is all subjective bias. The conflict was too intense.

How many of them came from watching videos............ Douyin hot model

The protagonist is a time traveler from thousands of years in the future, and the emperor believed it. He wanted the protagonist to enter the court as an official, but you wrote that the protagonist must learn the Four Books and Five Classics of the Analects and pass the imperial examination before he can enter the court as an official. Is there something wrong with your writing? The protagonist has wisdom thousands of years in the future, but you asked him to take the Analects exam.

It's just too little, not enough to watch. How many updates are there in a day?

I originally thought it was a cookie cutter novel, but after reading it, it is really a subversive work. The author has a solid historical background. Although there are some flaws, he has definitely read history and is not a novice who just listens to a few historical stories. The writing is solid, the plot is not bloody, violent and violent, rough and fine, excellent

I felt very comfortable reading this book before it was put on the shelf. I think it is one of the few works in the historical area that is not stupid, nor too sharp and pretentious. It is as if the author really traveled to the Song Dynasty and spent every day... But what I want to remind the author is that the protagonist in the article has always understood that the so-called Song Dynasty is a shithole that has barely overflowed, and the author has arranged for the protagonist not to follow the route of Shuangwen Tutu but to improve it. In fact, I am quite surprised that there seems to be such a small school suddenly recently, and it went to the Song Dynasty to improve it, and this Song Dynasty is particularly strange and familiar. Haha, I just want to say that my biggest purpose in reading novels is always to entertain and not anything else... I'm going too far. In short, I want to remind the author of three things: if the line is wrong, the more knowledge, the more reactionary; there are only individuals who betray the class, but there is no class that betrays the class; there is inevitability and contingency in historical development...

It can be felt that the author projects his own thoughts onto Zhao Jun. It is difficult to feel that Zhao Jun is a living person during the reading process.

It turned out that I was working on a novel for a long time as a class, and every day I just thought about how to teach readers. Can you think of how to add some wisdom to each character?

It's a bit difficult to explain. Some people think that what the author wrote is wrong, but they can't say it themselves It's wrong anyway, and there are so many historical versions. Why don't you give me a systematic analysis and give me some insight? If you just criticize a few words, I can do it.