Dressed as Cannon Fodder and Fake Daughter, She Worked Hard

Because I suddenly like this type of writing, I also read another modern setting mentioned in the comment section. I have seen some updates in this one, and I have read more than a hundred chapters in that one, so I can almost make a comparison. In terms of character design, obvious differences can be seen in the characters of the protagonists of the two books. The difference between the male protagonist and several supporting characters is particularly obvious, and there is no trace of low-level reference. As for the plot, several points repeatedly highlighted in the comment area are common memes that are not the main focus of the plot, such as opening a shop and giving cards to slap the female co-star in the face. This routine is found in eight out of ten cool articles written by male and female channels. The content and logical chain of the main plots of the two articles are completely different. On one side, it is a house fight + suspenseful investigation, and on the other side, Mary Sue is constantly slapped in the face with a bit of urban fantasy. The content and style of the subsequent plots on both sides are completely incompatible. There is no need to hold on to the previous public opinion. The two articles are similar because they both chose the theme of real and fake daughters, where the real and fake daughters go hand in hand, and there are overlaps in settings. But if you carefully prove it, you will definitely not be able to make a color palette, and there will be no overlap in the logic chain of the plot that can be regarded as a blend. Even in Jinjiang, which is the most strict about this, it will not be judged as plagiarism and blending. On the contrary, if it is posted on the forum, it will probably be said to be a mother's disease. In addition, as far as my personal aesthetic is concerned, compared to another modern novel, this one is much better in terms of writing style, logic, plot transition, and character creation. The other book has too many nonsense parts that violate common sense in life. Even if I brainwash myself with a Mary Sue filter, I only lasted for more than a hundred chapters before giving up. However, these two articles are available on V for free. The readers chosen are different, and it is understandable that the style is more biased towards my own audience. What makes me wonder is how the readers of this article accurately found this article that not many people have read, and have been discussing the explanation in the comment area using similar words and "evidence". I don't want to promote conspiracy theories, but this matter is really against common sense. If there is really a leader or organizer, I hope you can focus more of your efforts on other serious places. Finally, I would like to give some encouragement to the author. As I said above, your book's writing style and logic are superior in all aspects, and after reading both of them, I don't think it constitutes plagiarism or fusion. Although at present, the huge difference in popularity appears to be one-sided in the comment area, the determination of plagiarism and spoofing is not justified by whoever has the louder voice, nor does the book with the louder voice be better. Come on, write a book well, and don't let external voices affect your creation. Your work is your foundation, and you will be able to survive. After reading the update in the middle of the night, I looked at the comment area and typed a string of words. I hope the author can persevere and not waste his creative talent. Come on.

"Children tie bamboo into a wheel, spin it in a ring, and hang a lamp in the ring. It spins and overturns without the lamp falling over. A strong man transports it and throws it endlessly in the road. It is called rolling lamp." "The first surprise is the roar of the fragrance, the fire wheel is spinning in the center of the sky. The more surprising is the earth spirit playing bow, the red ball kicking up the Fusang Valley. The star bridge in the sky keeps flashing, how fast the silver jar flows in the world. The strong man who lights up the lantern boasts his skills, and there are all kinds of flying and flying." --Peng Sunyi's "The Lamp" [Part of the picture comes from the Internet, some of the picture comes from the scarf@李松君, and the last picture comes from the up owner of station b, yin diandian] This rolling lantern looks so fun. I'll make one when I have some free time.

That's it! A long time ago, I saw a video posted by a young lady. In the video, an old man was flipping through this flower basket, changing his movements and moving smoothly. It looked very fun! ! And he was still thinking about something while turning over the pages. "Both sides are called flying saucers, farmers' hats and small straw hats, Li Lianying's eunuch hats, Tang Monk's lotus hats..." "You stand up the water glass, you puff up the goldfish bowl, you pull up the goldfish bowl to call it a pen holder, you squeeze the high wine glass, you move the low wine glass..." "Two hydrangeas, badminton, planet cup, soju cup, cauldron, birdcage, yurt, small lantern, flower basket, windmill, turtle cage, darts, the big girl wears a straw hat..." That's probably it, because the old man has a bit of a dialect accent and I couldn't hear him very clearly. It feels very chronological, but it's a pity that I can't post the video. This thing seems to have been around during the Qianlong period? I searched specifically and found that a certain treasure is also sold, but the postage is too expensive😻 Wait until I win 500 yuan in the lottery before I buy it again

I'm used to reading the comments section first when reading a book, but I was surprised. I haven't read either book, so I can't comment on which one is right. I just saw a reader saying that the profiles are extremely similar. , Seems to have listed the similarities in detail, some personal thoughts: I think it is not objective to judge plagiarism based on the similarity of the introduction routines, because I have read no less than ten introductions with the same routine, and the similarities are no less than what the reader listed. This is like a student's composition routine. The teacher summarized it. Based on experience in recent years, argumentative papers should follow this routine and format. Even if the content is not outstanding, there will definitely not be a big mistake. Then most people follow this routine. In this way, you can say that he is not creative and follows the crowd, but it should not be considered plagiarism. The key is to look at the content. Plagiarism is shameful. The authors of the article have all contributed, and they will not want the fruits of their labor to be plagiarized or stolen. I hope both parties can sit down calmly and use formal and legal channels to study and resolve this matter. Cheers to both authors!

First of all, Liang Sheng said that if I don't respond, I can only leave a negative review. I think since this software has the evaluation function, it is not just a decoration, you can use it. This is your freedom, no need to find reasons for it. Secondly, my idea is simply that the response is useless. I rambled a lot, it should be a thousand words, but you only saw the first five words - I feel like swearing "This author still wants to scold me [laughing] [laughing], but now I won't respond directly." "Even with the revised introduction, there are still many similarities" I'm at a loss and I don't know how to refute you. I think these two sentences are not problematic in themselves, because I did want to curse people a little bit, and I did change the introduction. It just looks wrong looking like this, maybe because they all have the invisibility condition. Firstly, it feels like I have started to curse, and secondly, it feels like I changed the introduction just to change the similarities. For the first one, I didn't curse, and I didn't want to say something dirty. I was just expressing my unhappiness. For the second one, you already thought it was like that, and I didn't change much, so of course it still looks like that. But I have said before that I have not changed my profile significantly, but I will revise it every few days because I am not satisfied every time I see it. You see, I responded, but you turned a blind eye and asked me to continue responding. And you said, "Aren't you afraid that the author will become angry because he doesn't dare to be reasonable these days?" I've been trying to reason with you calmly. I feel that I am pretty good at it. While taking into account the normal life in the three-dimensional world and the task of coding, I should be able to explain this matter in no less than a thousand words. Because I know the principle of three people becoming a tiger, public opinion is something that eats people without spitting out bones, is blind and does not distinguish right from wrong. Especially at the beginning, my friend Jun Cixi had a very good attitude and she was willing to listen. Of course I had to explain. But now, I won't explain it to those who can't listen. As the author, I can delete any comments I don't like. The reason why I ignored this matter for half a month was because I felt it was rude to delete other people's comments. I even didn't even look at the comment area because I didn't want the comments to disturb my thoughts. Of course, I naively thought that you would look at it yourself and reconcile yourself. But if you don't even want to read my response, why would you read my book? Moreover, human beings always have preconceptions. With this concept, you look for similarities between two novels of the same type. You are a fan of another book. How can I change your attitude? Later, it gradually became that if passers-by came over, they would be told to leave directly. I also saw that you said that she is sick over there, but she will be fine. My book is here. When you get better, tell her about this and use legal means to punish me who you think has done something wrong. Oh, one more thing you can do is to incite other friends to come and give low scores. I don't know what will happen to books that have been maliciously given low scores. You can give it a try. Finally, I will add that I will change the title of the book in the future, and if the title is changed, the book cover will have to be redone. Because it is a free operation, the name cannot contain the word "green tea". (I will keep the building where Jun Cixi's book is written. The original title and introduction of the book are there. If you are interested, go look there.) Don't have such big mood swings like when I changed my profile. I'm so helpless. In fact, I know from across the screen that you are so young, filled with righteous indignation and refuse to admit defeat, and will continue to persist in what you believe in. But I don't have time to deal with your persistence all the time --- Attached is part of the outline, as a final explanation.

Damn, the plots of these two books are probably the same. I'm confused.

There are too many similarities with another book, right? It's exactly the same, right?

Looks very similar to the big brother's sister who wears a vest

The population of the Hou Mansion is simple and clear, while the population of the Qiao Mansion is a little more complicated. You can see it here. (Of course, it doesn't matter if you can't figure it out, my grandfather's family doesn't have many scenes~)

I have been too lazy to write, so I thought I might as well write something to protect the new kids from the thunder. 1. The two female protagonists are affectionate. They each have their own emotional lines, which are relatively small, so children who like the interaction between male and female protagonists should be cautious. (Jiang Sheng x Jiang Yan/Jiang Xian x Xiao Huaijing) 2. There is a Danmei line *It seems I can't write this, so it will be very obscure and obscure, but there is, because I want to write it* (Jiang Yunsheng x Qiao Jiang) If you don't like the lines, you can skip them carefully after reading the title and previous text. Skipping a few chapters usually won't affect the plot. You can complain about my plot writing, typos, etc., Etc., But don't complain about my characters at the end of the chapter. Thank you.