Miss Witch, Please Stop Doing This

I sorted out the timeline of this book, but what? It involves serious spoilers. If anyone wants it, I can post it. If anyone doesn't want to comment here, if anyone wants to comment here, if you want it, rate it as "want". If you don't want it, rate it as "don't want it". Also, this book is really beautiful and the plot is very good. The author is good at side descriptions. Well, it can be said that the writing style is better. It is great as a daily leisure article.

From an evolutionary perspective Because of the magical power of the witch, the underlying physiological needs can be easily satisfied, allowing the witch to eat well and drink well. If you had slightly more complicated emotions, you would have committed suicide long ago. Even those who are cheerful and silly all day long cannot be eliminated. That is why Lilith in the article does not understand human emotions. The witch in the book comes from the people who are condensed from the magic of the mainland. To put it simply, people who can guess the other person's psychological ability have already committed suicide because they have magic power. People who can't guess the other person's ability will not be eliminated. Those witches who are cheerful and silly will not be eliminated. Only those who are happy every day are alive because they have magic power and their basic physiological needs are fully satisfied. The so-called recognition of human emotions means having the ability to guess the other person's psychology. However, if you want to have the ability to guess the other person's psychology, you must have strong teamwork skills, that is, to be able to give the other person what he wants, and then let him do things for me according to my words, etc. (I have no experience in the third grade of junior high school). Of course, it will also create a huge spiritual world, and this witch, because she is born with magic power, this thing is very powerful, which leads to those who have not evolved the ability to guess the other person's psychology. People have not been eliminated, and coupled with longevity, we can guess in the other person's heart that if he does not live for two or three hundred years, he will basically not want to live anymore because the spiritual world, you know, there is no special method to regulate it, and then you eat and drink well, then it is over, you have enough food and clothing, and then there is a huge spiritual world. It would be weird if you don't commit suicide. Then only those who are happy and silly survive. I don't know why, the more I talk about it, the more familiar it becomes. Why does it feel like oh, it's like describing modern society? I also want to write about the underlying reason why it takes thousands of years to reform a system like that. But it takes thousands of years to reform a system because everyone is happy and stupid. This seems to be the reason. Does anyone else have any other opinions?

First of all, the foreshadowing has been laid before. The apprentice is using undead magic. Then, I still think that according to the order of the author's description of the specific situation, now, the big apprentice should not be very good at it, but judging from the genius's character, it should still be possible. Hey, no, didn't the Death Witch mentioned above say it would take hundreds of years to recover? According to what Lilith said in the article, the strongest necromancy magic should not be resurrected. Well, this kind of plot that I feel is the most exciting is directly cut off by the previous article. And the timeline is not very good, so don't expect too much. Then what I want to say to the author: Author, my guess about you is that you should be a college student, right? When I got to college, the sole value of academics disappeared and the judgment of people's rights and wrongs was replaced by interests. Then I was still a little confused. I didn't know what to do when I entered the society? Anyway, I am very certain about the future. I am here to ask for your opinion. I want to publish an argumentative essay of more than 2,000 words in your book review area. The argumentative essay briefly describes my future ideals and why middle school students do not have ideals. Also, in the chapter of the Eight Apostles, you can actually deceive that Lilith a few more times, and maybe use it again, but I've already written it so I won't say anything more, and what is the foreshadowing of turning defeat into victory? Isn't that just a stand-in, just the first-level magician? And then you said that the true form of the abyss is coming and will kill the witch. Good guy, then use this stand to weaken the witch first, and then when the true form comes, or if it doesn't work, get another stand? Not to mention anything else, slightly stronger witches will also come, but as I mentioned before, Lilith needs her dragon to come. It seems that witches basically don't have teleportation magic, right? And the previous article said that it would take two or three hours for Lilith to ride the magic dragon to the magic city. Does that mean it would take two or three hours for other witches to come to support? But for the abyss stand-in in the middle, he said two or three hours would be enough. Well, it's quite vague anyway. I'm really looking forward to your turnaround. Maybe it's because the plot is not coherent, or maybe it's because your logic is better. I haven't found any logical loopholes so far. I like it very much. Of course, even if I don't like it, it doesn't matter. After all, there is no financial support. There are so many words. Anyone who can read this is a warrior. Although I have read the entire 230,000-word "Game Theory" and made annotations on every page, I have probably made 70,000 to 80,000 words of annotations, right? But people on the Internet are anxious because they are all fragmented and their minds are broken. By the way, does anyone want to take a look at the comments I made? You can flip through it. If you want to read it in detail, there are more than 400 pages. One page contains about one or two thousand words of articles and two or three hundred words of comments. In fact, reading "Theory of Games" is just like reading this book. It is very interesting. Now I am reading "The Wealth of Nations". Okay, it leads to The Wealth of Nations. I am here to make another request to the author. Can I also post my opinions on The Wealth of Nations in this book review area? Well, okay, it's not good to talk too much, that's all.

The plot is not good, I feel retarded watching it

The author still has more knowledge What is good about this chapter of the author? Fortunately, Lilith did not ask people to forgive directly, but said that he had no right to forgive, but he had the right to let people remember his kindness. It can be said that he was telling everyone that witches are different, and not all witches are bad. This truth, and using the regional blackness of this city that has been laid out before as an example, said that it is prejudice, and people who can live in that city must have memories of this city, so what they agree with is prejudice, not that they are really bad. To sum up If you don't say forgiveness directly The second put the prejudices of the Rhine City into perspective and mapped them onto the prejudices against witches, highlighting that witches are different and letting them know that at least Lilith is good.

Well, I will post the timeline of this book here first. Well, it is still in the form of pictures. If I refine it, it will be too much. I deleted a lot. Then, I found that a lot of it was nonsense, and then I deleted a lot. In the end, I found that only a little bit was left, and then there are these chapters that I just read. When it comes to making a timeline, it's all squeezed into one day, and I still have a lot to say. I'm going to try my best to summarize it in one sentence. That's it for now, and I'll improve it later. Then I'll just delete all the rest. There's really too much to write. It's not about talking too much, it's about simplicity. The dialogue is not about being strong, but about being reciprocal. Author, I am making a request to you. Do you have a fan base or something? Or add WeChat/QQ? Author, I feel like you are a woman, but I actually wish you were a man. Author, do you think I am a boy or a girl? The economic base determines the superstructure. I still know this. (Except for the intermediate transitions, there are too many intermediate transitions, but here suddenly something is so abrupt. Even if there is no foreshadowing in the previous one, just ask me if it is okay to express my opinions on the Wealth of Nations here? Or: stop here)

Chapter 5 of my book The Wealth of Nations discusses the real and nominal prices of commodities or their labor prices and money prices. From here I came to a smaller understanding, which is the origin of contracts, and then the nature of money is similar to what I thought before. This author (referring to Adam Smith, the father of modern economics, will be used as the author in the following text) The nature of money, it led me to go a little deeper, you can In this way, labor creates money, and only when labor creates commodities can money appear to represent it. (I would like to mention here, like that kind of financing, the interest rate on U. S. Treasury bonds increases, so that the money earned from investment is less than the money stored in the Treasury bonds, allowing the dollars to flow back to the Bank of the United States, and then Then lend U. S. Dollars at a high price, etc. This is the act of robbing others. If you have a lot of money and goods, the profit is to exploit the goods and rob others... Anyway, there are not many examples, so there is no beginning and you can't go on. Let's continue reading The Wealth of Nations and see if I can elaborate more later) As for money, it is an intermediary. It needs to have purchasing power. It needs to be exchangeable for things as a basis (usefulness is the basis), and then there is credit, that is, it can be exchanged for continuation (trust is the continuation). Here again, the market price is introduced, because labor is not easy to compare. Then after a little summary here, we can summarize the principles of inflation and deflation. Hey, my dear, it feels so inconsistent to talk about this here, and it is not good to talk about it during a chat. No matter when you say it, this is not good. Things like this are more suitable to be kept in your mind. Is the author an economics major? I don't want to know much about the author. Well, speaking of this, I am more interested in writing the timeline of this witch book. Anyway, read the notes I wrote, and then read the content of the page in the book, and then summarize it casually. If you want to write a paper, it will be 2000 words, 30 00 words, I should be able to do it. I will post the 2000-word paper here 😘 Oh, I originally planned to publish it as a book, but QQ Reading disagreed and said that my classification was wrong. "Game Theory" can be posted here, why can't my "Daily Theory"? Okay, I'd better get the timeline and copy mine directly. I'll post this one. If you want to see the basis for this, how did you come up with it? Although some of them do not quote the original text, they are all based on the original text, such as the picture below, and there are also self-explanations on The Wealth of Nations and Game Theory. I have annotated all of the game theory. If you want to read it, it is better to read it in a book, but I think no one will be interested. I will write it here and make a book review.