U
by I
About This Novel
This book selects Maupassant's most representative short stories and short stories, including popular masterpieces such as "Ball of Suet", "The Necklace" and "My Uncle Jules", as well as the twists and turns of "The Mother of Freaks" and "The Hypnotic Chair". Maupassant was good at cutting out typical fragments from ordinary and trivial things, and summarizing the reality of life with small insights. His novels have unique conceptions, ups and downs of plots, vivid and detailed descriptions, and lifelike characters, which make people have endless aftertaste after reading them.
What Readers Think
Rating
Community(0)
Official(5)Scraped 3d ago
Mother of Freaks
He is really a devil. He may have had difficulties in the beginning, but in the end he was full of greed. Unfortunate children
Woman repairing upholstered chair
Blindly giving and loving a shameless and cruel person for a lifetime. This kind of paranoid love is too depressing.
Is this really a Maupassant novel?
Is this really a Maupassant novel?
I wonder if this is the content of Maupassant's novel?
I wonder if this is the content of Maupassant's novel
After reading Chekhov's short novella, I read Maupassant's. Both were giants of the short story. Maupassant's article seems cleaner, but Chekhov's is more down-to-earth, less purposeful, and less direct. My favorite chapters include "Miss Pearl", "My Uncle Jules" and "The Mansion of Tellier". Everyone likes radish and greens, but I still prefer Chekhov. Chekhov's description is broader and deeper. After the author describes it, the reader does not think about the will for a while, but just recalls the boundless and pervasive impression and thinks over and over again.
Rating
Community(0)
Official(5)Scraped 3d ago
Mother of Freaks
He is really a devil. He may have had difficulties in the beginning, but in the end he was full of greed. Unfortunate children
Woman repairing upholstered chair
Blindly giving and loving a shameless and cruel person for a lifetime. This kind of paranoid love is too depressing.
Is this really a Maupassant novel?
Is this really a Maupassant novel?
I wonder if this is the content of Maupassant's novel?
I wonder if this is the content of Maupassant's novel
After reading Chekhov's short novella, I read Maupassant's. Both were giants of the short story. Maupassant's article seems cleaner, but Chekhov's is more down-to-earth, less purposeful, and less direct. My favorite chapters include "Miss Pearl", "My Uncle Jules" and "The Mansion of Tellier". Everyone likes radish and greens, but I still prefer Chekhov. Chekhov's description is broader and deeper. After the author describes it, the reader does not think about the will for a while, but just recalls the boundless and pervasive impression and thinks over and over again.
