Popular Romance of the Past Dynasties (11 in Total)
by Cai Dongfan
About This Novel
With more than 2,000 years of history from the Qin Dynasty to the Republic of China, Cai Dongfan used official history as the classic and anecdotes as the weft, and used the language of "The Romance of the Three Kingdoms", which is not very profound in writing and not very vulgar in language, to write this most complete set of historical novels in China. From the creation of "Popular Romance of Qing History" in 1915 to the publication of "Popular Romance of Later Han Dynasty" in 1926, the entire set of "Popular Romance of Historical Dynasties" took ten years to complete. In addition to being very story-telling and interesting, this set of novels also attaches great importance to the authenticity of historical materials. Not only can it be used as a general leisure reading, but it can also be used as a reference book for history lovers.
What Readers Think
Rating
Community(0)
Official(414)Scraped 21d ago
The first chapter is very uncomfortable to watch.
The author writes about Qin Shihuang with too much bias. First of all, Qin Shihuang was not a tyrant in his early days. His early actions were worthy of being a wise king, otherwise he would not have been able to unify the six countries. Secondly, Qin Shihuang was the first to use the title of emperor, and he didn't like the bloody violence mentioned by the author. Finally, Qin Shihuang is indeed an emperor through the ages. I hope there will be less prejudice. Sometimes what you read in history books may not be the real history. Personal opinion, light spray
I have the confidence to read dozens of chapters, but I don't have the confidence to finish reading. After all, some parts are really not easy to understand, and the development of Chinese history cannot be determined by just one person's opinion. Some evaluations disagree.
This is misleading. Seeing that the evaluation of Qin is so unfair, I really can't continue reading.
Good. Good book.
I think there are so many good reviews, but how many people are really watching it.
The evaluation of Qin Shihuang is unfair
Good. Good book.
Good. Good book.
Good. Good book.
Good. Good book.
Rating
Community(0)
Official(414)Scraped 21d ago
The first chapter is very uncomfortable to watch.
The author writes about Qin Shihuang with too much bias. First of all, Qin Shihuang was not a tyrant in his early days. His early actions were worthy of being a wise king, otherwise he would not have been able to unify the six countries. Secondly, Qin Shihuang was the first to use the title of emperor, and he didn't like the bloody violence mentioned by the author. Finally, Qin Shihuang is indeed an emperor through the ages. I hope there will be less prejudice. Sometimes what you read in history books may not be the real history. Personal opinion, light spray
I have the confidence to read dozens of chapters, but I don't have the confidence to finish reading. After all, some parts are really not easy to understand, and the development of Chinese history cannot be determined by just one person's opinion. Some evaluations disagree.
This is misleading. Seeing that the evaluation of Qin is so unfair, I really can't continue reading.
Good. Good book.
I think there are so many good reviews, but how many people are really watching it.
The evaluation of Qin Shihuang is unfair
Good. Good book.
Good. Good book.
Good. Good book.
Good. Good book.
