Dungeon Survival: I Can Hear the Beep

Are editors so strict about authors now? I just clicked on this book and someone commented that his review had been deleted. Then the author explained below that his editor asked them to write books on this type of subject. Some trolls accused him of plagiarism, so they kept deleting the review. I didn't believe it at first, but then I went out and read the next book. . . Successfully made me believe what the author said

I keep reading book reviews about plagiarism and screenshots~ My point is... Survival in a cave is a genre, so anyone can write about it. Everyone knows that when a theme becomes popular, it will attract countless followers, such as the previous isekai, time travel, doomsday, rebirth, infinity, one through Naruto, and one through One Piece. Can you say that others are plagiarizing? The same goes for survival in a cave. This subject has been popular for a long time (I have read it before and paid dozens of yuan for a subscription), but Kaishangui (the first person to write about this subject) is not reading on QQ. The few books that can be found here are all following others, so writing about survival in a cave is not considered plagiarism. The key is to look at the content and plot.

What do you mean? You don't need the rest.

It's still pretty good to watch, and the plot is good, but the girl's sense of disobedience is too strong. I still like the protagonist to leave on his own. If Luo hadn't left later, I might have given up on the article🤐🤐

Look, you guys got married where you are, hahaha

Big boost, author ^0^~ Don't care what others say, just write according to your own settings. No matter how you write, someone will always ask this or that question.

The original book is still somewhat interesting, but the pets in the early stage are too useless, and the author said that they are stronger in the later stage. . . Looking at a useless pet that keeps eating resources, has a bad temper, and has a lot of drama, I can't hold on to the later stages.

This book actually looks okay. Although it is not a very good book, I can keep reading it. The following words are also quite interesting. Regardless of whether it is a similar book to others, this is still a new author. The author carefully wrote tens of thousands of words. Please try to give more encouragement and less complaints. And this author is particularly... Um... Polite? I don't know how to put it, but he is the only author I've ever seen who can respond uniformly regardless of whether the comments are good or bad. If you like it, leave it as one of his little fans. If you don't like it, don't make malicious comments or be arrogant. There are not many books of this type at present, but there should be two or three books of the same kind. If it is impossible to write similar books like you said, then the time-travel novel would have been badly written long ago. Aren't all the books about rebirth and time traveling through reincarnation badly written? There are still many people writing them. There aren't many books of this type yet, and this book looks pretty good. You might as well give it a try to catch up. If it doesn't work, you can just stop. It won't waste much energy. In short, life is short, why not give it a try. Newcomers please support me.

From the very beginning of this book, it is shown that the male protagonist is not a good old man, he has his own scheming, he will trade leftover meat with others for supplies, and he will obtain higher value supplies based on the asymmetry of intelligence. However, Luo Yuanyi will have a strong sense of disobedience as soon as she comes out. Why would the male protagonist help her? The two of them are neither relatives nor friends, and the elder sister can't stand the drag, and the younger sister seems to have no common sense at all. In this context, blindly following the male protagonist to the garden without knowing the danger is like sightseeing? That sister looked so cold and unfavorable to the male protagonist, and didn't persuade her not to follow him. Isn't this outrageous? Okay, even if I mentioned before that my sister said that the male protagonist is a good person, her irritating look is not of much use. Your description of the male protagonist is that he looks like a gentleman and is not lustful, so why keep it? It's really just the landlord's surplus food. It's basically a forced insertion of a female protagonist, nothing too outrageous.

I really like this book. The ideas are very good and eye-catching. Come on, I will update it every day!