Grant's Academy of Natural Sciences

I hope that book friends who like Egret will come and sign up, and let us work together to make the comments more active. Thanks

Scientists should not be fools. Facing a group of gods who dominate in terms of individual power, it would be too wasteful to run into them like iron-headed children. The worldview in the novel is different from reality. Gods are powerful and can perform miracles. Religion has stronger centripetal force and persuasiveness, and is more authoritative than Catholicism in reality. It is too difficult to simply present facts and reason to break the authority of religion, enlighten people's wisdom, and promote ideological emancipation and "scientific progress." "Science" wants to overwhelm religious belief, and what it wants to prove is not the "correctness" of theories, because the average number of "illiterate" believers cannot understand advanced theories. Only by proving that the "scientific" way of thinking is advanced, educating and guiding believers to think in "scientific" ways, and discover problems on their own can we effectively impact religious beliefs. A simple scientist is not as destructive as an educator. How wonderful it is for scientists to conduct scientific research quietly, and how wonderful it is for underground work to move forward with heavy loads. Let those who understand the truth of science but lack research capabilities engage in "pyramid schemes" and use education to destroy faith. How can any scientist commit a suicide attack? Is this a mistake? Who does he think he is in the eyes of believers? Narcissistic? Is dying valuable?

The previous study was okay at the end of the first level, but the plot was not so good at the beginning of the second level. It felt like the protagonist suddenly changed and he was not the same as before. He was arrogant and arrogant. He had no IQ and said he had a high IQ. He was a little smart. But it was the same concept as the Grimmby in the previous part. Although the writing was good, it might have involved some real-life knowledge. I felt that the author was a bit blindly pursuing such knowledge to connect it so that his writing could not collapse. But this time the character portrayal is much worse and the power is The system upgrade is too fast, and the level is not grasped well. The plot scenes are too messy. It feels like you want to design the protagonist to reach level seven in this star-twilight world, but also design the background of the universe. It seems that there are many more powerful civilizations and more powerful people, but according to your current level Level method: when the protagonist leaves the novice village, he must be at least level 7. If he goes to level 8 in Aurora, he will hopefully be able to see it at level 9. Of course, if you don't end at level 9 in the previous part and then go up, then your system is backward. If you end at level 9, your background will be of little use. The character plot of The Wizard's Journey is very complete in system and very detailed in its depiction, but I just don't know that the author of this book has regressed a lot except for his writing style.

I'll go first. I've already read two chapters, and I think it will definitely be good. It's a particularly good-looking wizarding novel. I hope the author will continue to work hard.

This book has been useless since a mathematical researcher was able to roll a small fireball with his hands. When mathematicians of the same level can beat a knight head-on, this book will be useless.

There may really be no God in the real world, so the church is unable to conduct more detailed observations of the universe due to limited conditions. However, the setting in the book is that there is a supernatural being like God. According to common sense, his understanding of the world must be relatively high, so why would he pass down teachings with loopholes? If there are loopholes, they will be exposed one day, which will have a negative impact on God's prestige. At the same time, the heliocentric theory talks about the world revolving around the sun. The sun is associated with light. Isn't it that all living beings surround the God of Light? Isn't this kind of theory better able to demonstrate the authority of the God of Light?

The law of the dark forest is well quoted. There are also quite a lot of strength attributes in it. However, the scene in the middle where a scholar is dissecting specimens and laughing in a sickly manner is too abrupt. Although it is to highlight the difference between real scholars and ordinary people, it does not need to be so abrupt and suddenly abnormal.

After reading dozens of chapters, I was put off by the character of the protagonist. I don't like this dull, devoid of spiritual character. The subject matter and background are my favorite themes, but the knowledge points and imagination of the protagonist are too simple. I originally thought he was a time traveler, otherwise he might have gained the knowledge of a time traveler. But the protagonist is a local aborigine. I haven't watched the rest of it, but the protagonist's character in the first part has poor thinking ability and a narrow mind. Coupled with the fact that it is placed in a Renaissance-like background, it feels like the whole world has been de-intellectualized.

As a loyal book lover, if Bai Lu dares to mess up Bai Wen Stallion, we will condemn him here and break him straight.

The author has finally published a new book, warm congratulations! The world view is somewhat similar to Arcane Throne, I hope to see something different