Research on the Nanjing 1644 Bacterial Unit of the Japanese Invaders

Research on the Nanjing 1644 Bacterial Unit of the Japanese Invaders

by Zhu Qingru

Length:
252Kwords54chapters
Latest:
Ch. 54后记
Activity:
Updated 11mo agoScraped 15d ago
7Favorites
0QD Score

About This Novel

The Nanjing "Rong" 1644 Unit of the Japanese invaders was one of Japan's six overseas bacteriological units during World War II. Its organizational size, bacteriological weapons research and development and actual combat capabilities were second only to the Harbin Unit 731. This book is based on the peaceful vision of the international community prohibiting the use of weapons of mass destruction. By exposing the history of biological and bacteriological warfare crimes of the "Rong" 1644 Unit, it achieves the academic goal of warning the world and serving as a mirror. This book first uses Japanese war history documents, the Soviet Union's "Kaboli Trial Materials", and relevant declassified materials in American collections as the main basis. Secondly, it uses the research results of Chinese, Japanese, and American scholars as important references to explore how the "Glory" 1644 unit was organized and organized, the development of bacterial weapons, actual combat, and collapse issues; the first choice is the Chinese original Based on original documents, and the research results of Chinese, Japanese, and American scholars and local cultural and historical workers (including oral histories of perpetrators, victims and survivors), it explores the harm caused by the joint implementation of bacteriological warfare by "Rong" 1644 Unit and Harbin Unit 731 and other Japanese bacteriological warfare agencies in vast areas of central China, as well as the gains and losses of China's epidemic prevention work. This book contains rich literature references and detailed historical materials. It is currently the first historical monograph at home and abroad to systematically study the "Rong" 1644 bacterial unit of the Japanese army that invaded China.

What Readers Think

Rating

Good0%Neutral0%Bad0%

Community(0)

You Might Also Like