Broken Planet 3: Stone Sky
About This Novel
It won the 2017 Nebula Award for Best Novel, the 2018 Hugo Award for Best Novel, and the 2018 Locus Award for Best Novel. Following Orson Scott Card, N. K. Jemisin became the second science fiction writer in the history of the Hugo Awards to win the Novel Award for consecutive years. Thousands of years ago, Sir-Anagist was the source of all death and darkness. A series of events made Ethan, who inherited Elbast's mantle, become the most powerful orogen on the entire planet. She decided to seize the moon, restore the world, and end all seasons of disaster. Nassun walked through the fire, heading to the "Dead Civilization Site" - the core point, to seize control of the Obelisk Gate. She has seen enough of the evil in the world, and what cannot be changed can only be destroyed; until the world burns into a sea of fire. Will humanity's destruction, or continuation, depend on two women? At the end of the journey, will we enter the light or fall into the abyss?
What Readers Think
Rating
Community(0)
Official(1)Scraped 20d ago
It's always good to win prizes
I finished reading the three series in a row. I didn't want to say anything as someone who likes to read and comment like me, but when I saw it was so deserted, haha. Science fiction has never been mainstream in China. In fact, it is also the same abroad. However, everyone wants to develop. Now it has become an economic issue. Can stock trading realize the four modernizations? Science fiction has never been a scientific heresy or scraps. Many people think that this book's award is the result of political correctness and is not worth defending. There are very few science fiction stories about geology. Jules Verne's Journey to the Center of the Earth is less scientifically based than this book. Why is it a classic? The best thing about the book is that it describes the society under disaster very interestingly. I like it. As for magic and primordial power, it's a matter of opinion. After all, it is a women's novel from a female perspective.
Rating
Community(0)
Official(1)Scraped 20d ago
It's always good to win prizes
I finished reading the three series in a row. I didn't want to say anything as someone who likes to read and comment like me, but when I saw it was so deserted, haha. Science fiction has never been mainstream in China. In fact, it is also the same abroad. However, everyone wants to develop. Now it has become an economic issue. Can stock trading realize the four modernizations? Science fiction has never been a scientific heresy or scraps. Many people think that this book's award is the result of political correctness and is not worth defending. There are very few science fiction stories about geology. Jules Verne's Journey to the Center of the Earth is less scientifically based than this book. Why is it a classic? The best thing about the book is that it describes the society under disaster very interestingly. I like it. As for magic and primordial power, it's a matter of opinion. After all, it is a women's novel from a female perspective.
