Ming Zhenzhi, This Man is Too Strong

In fact, this perfect acting skill just seems useless and a useless function, but it is actually quite useful. After all, this is a god-level detective system, and you will definitely encounter some murderers. At this time, expressions become particularly important.

The setting of this article is quite novel. Please refer to the introduction for details. It can be said that it comes with its own inference IP, which is why I clicked in. But that's also why I have the energy to post comments. Using IP is completely ok. If you write carefully, you won't be angry even if your writing is not good. But there are really too many typos in this article! I think I've seen a few times where it was half-written as average, let alone anything else. I read about 90 chapters. At first, typos only appeared every other paragraph. Later, almost every chapter had errors. Some of the errors were commented by readers, but I could still see that the author had not changed them at all. Originally, the author used IP adaptation to save a lot of time in designing his own case. Moreover, the author basically used more than 90% of the text in the article to write the case under the setting of his live broadcast. The remaining less than 10% was just a few simple sentences connecting the system with daily life. This not only led to the elimination of the characters in the author's works. It's a time-travel story, and it doesn't have any characteristics other than being a little smart. Once involved in a case, it has no sense of existence, or it only makes me think of the person in the case and forget about the protagonist. Others basically have the same feeling of two cases, and can't remember the character created by the author. This is quite fatal. Moreover, writing this way also greatly reduces the various character relationships, event logic, etc. That the author needs to think about on his own. Using IP to write in this way is already labor-saving, but the author has even the most basic typos, which I really can't understand. This is not a question of whether the writing is good or not, but a question of attitude. It may even be serious, but there were a few moments when I really felt that if it was written in this way, it would be better not to touch these well-known IPs. Really, even if I read it twice after writing, it wouldn't be like this, right? After all, some typos still affect reading. . . At the same time, the treatment of the world view is not self-explanatory, and it can even be said that there are big loopholes. Even if there are no identical works in a world that advocates reasoning, I think there will still be similar techniques. If everyone in the world is mediocre in reasoning, without any difficult cases or novel ideas, then how did reasoning become popular around the world? Are you really going to ignore it and forcibly suppress your intelligence? Originally, according to the author, this show was about watching the IQ game between great masters, which is what I wanted to see, but as soon as the forced intelligence reduction started, it instantly turned into the feeling of an adult bullying a bunch of little kids in a kindergarten. . . I have only read two cases so far, so I will complain about these two issues. The following contains spoilers. I have not read the works in the author's introduction, so I chose carefully! Guard against drama through wall wall The first one is, first of all, the time of death of the deceased. Really, it was so clear from the beginning of the case. Is it true that no one noticed anything wrong until the end? I can understand the investigation team involved in the case, but they can't see it clearly from inside the bureau, but what about the large number of spectators? Although the author later forcefully explained that he had forgotten because everyone despised the protagonist, but. . . Let me ask a question first, will you forget when the drama you have been following will be updated? Especially for this kind of phenomenal work, which has countless ardent fans. And I don't believe that no one recorded and broadcast this kind of global live broadcast. I don't believe that the director team didn't record and broadcast it. After all, isn't there a replay after this? In this case, there are still barrages discussing the time of the crime, and no one understands it. Outrageous. At the same time, it's outrageous that the director didn't know the method until the end. First of all, they knew who the murderer was from the beginning. They had to tell the director in advance, right? On the one hand, it is fair and on the other hand, it is convenient to announce the results. Secondly, although they said they would not film or broadcast the day the protagonist disappeared, I really don't believe that everyone on the directing team did not know what the protagonist was doing. After all, he was still at the filming location. Is it possible that the designer of the case suddenly disappeared for a day? Didn't they say they were all miniature cameras? Don't need to ensure safety? Even to the extreme, are you not afraid of cheating and running away? Finally, I kept wondering where the body of the homeless man the protagonist killed came from? Aren't they all talking about high imitation? If they don't actually do it, then the director team will definitely know that there are two corpses when preparing the corpse props. I also thought that in order to maintain the mystery, the protagonist directly used the first high-imitation corpse for secondary processing. . . But when it comes to authenticity, the secondary processing technology of high-imitation corpses is not allowed, and because although the murder weapon is the same between the two corpses, the murder process is definitely not exactly the same, so there are no flaws in the evidence left during the autopsy (by the way, I still can't remember whether the corpse was completely burned or only the fingerprints were destroyed... After all, it was completely burned. There is no need to stress about destroying the fingerprints later.) Anyway, as the director team who controls the overall shooting and all the prop arrangements, I really don't believe that they can't see the problem in the first case. If they can see that the case is not simple, then there is no explanation for their helpless attitude when the boss puts pressure. . . In short, the first case was okay for the people involved, but the aura of intellectual deception in the audience was so serious that I couldn't believe that those were people in the era of national reasoning. . . The second case, I really can't complain about this case, even the detective's IQ can't be saved. The case itself did have some confusion among the authorities. Although it was not as serious as the first case, it was a bit difficult to react to, so the pace was normal at the beginning of the second case. But later on, especially in the final reasoning, the detective had already thought of the male and female protagonist's accomplices, and the answer was really ready to come out, but he was stunned to force someone to come in. And he also said that all the circumstances have been taken into account, but is it so difficult to act with fake injuries? We are all accomplices and we all know that the shooting was an act, why can't we think more deeply? You said that the two of them tried their best to prove their alibi but ended up attacking the one but failed to prove the other one. Then these two people are still trying to prove it! ? If this whole act of acting thing is exposed, the person who actually does it must be protected, right? After all, even if the real culprit is not found, even if they are suspected to be accomplices, they cannot be convicted. This operation is really confusing. If you didn't mention that these two people may be working together from beginning to end, you are a fan of the authorities, but you brought it up and came up with an even more unreliable conclusion. I am really speechless. I won't say anything about the fact that the audience didn't have much to think about from the beginning to the end because they turned on the halo of wisdom and waited for the detective to feed their reasoning. . . But there is one thing to say, the black technology setting of the fake injury is not bad. Although I don't know how far the technology of the parallel world has developed, the skill tree is really big in order to make the acting realistic. To keep the case in context. . In other words, the idea of the mystery of the directing team is quite good (although I still want to complain about the freedom that even the directing team cannot know the whole case... Is there really nothing going on? For example, being caught at the beginning... Cough.) In short, I have disturbed everyone with a lot of rants. Maybe I am old and have a tendency to complain, so it is not easy for those who can read this patiently. . . Bow. Finally, the author is different. . Get angry, correct the typos, and add more descriptions of your own to make the events more vivid and your characters more three-dimensional. At the same time, I have a little suggestion because you used a lot of dialogue descriptions, but different people have different speaking styles, habits, and tones. If you don't know how to change the description, start with the dialogue first?

Forget about real water, is it still expensive?

After reading five chapters, I was successfully persuaded to quit. The plot had no ups and downs and was not eye-catching. The author should be a newbie. I didn't write the golden three chapters well, so I just persuaded the old bookworm to quit.

Some chapters have more than ten or twenty book coins, and some have fifty or sixty or even eighty or ninety. What do you mean? It's too much.

As the title says, it really has something to do with it! ! !

I have one thing to say, it's quite fun to watch, and I'm looking forward to the new plot of the crime, but if this plot continues, there won't be more girls who have an affair with the protagonist. Here 🙏 please don't use a harem or anything like that, it's uncomfortable

It was quite good when I first read it, but later on there were a lot of typos, as well as the y and l. I hope the author will change it and check it after writing. After all, detective articles need to be more rigorous and have higher requirements.

I thought no one had written this. I give you five stars and a vote.

Brothers, you must tell the truth (the dog will live longer)