Selected Short Stories of Gorky
by H
About This Novel
This book selects eight of Gorky's works, most of which are his early short stories. As we all know, among Gorky's rich literary heritage, short stories are a treasure. It was from short stories that Gorky began his creation and became famous for his achievements. His short stories are both romantic and realistic. Romantic works aim to praise freedom and light and entrust the author's lofty revolutionary ideals and passion for fighting, such as "Makar Chudra" and "Old Lady Izegil".
What Readers Think
Rating
Community(0)
Official(2)Scraped 6d ago
On the acupoint `}:7. }`L}`minus 0``ⅰer, Han氵, cow enters one pear and no one''Q: upper shape one; Ji; one} p:γ one i氵:冫:. The sound is faint, and the store contains information. : One. ! ! . , One. One'. . :
After reading short stories and novellas by Tolstoy, Chekhov, Turgenev ("Hunter's Notes"), and Gorky, I thought that long novels seemed to be a waste of energy. Why not just finish the story in a short and concise way? Why do it have to be so long? In particular, there are many long articles that have to be read to the second half or require reading the entire book to understand the depth. Even Tolstoy's "World and Peace" and "Anna", without a second reading, are only imprinted in my heart by many fragments, rather than the main theme of the entire novel. Of course, the second and third readings should have a deeper impact on the entire article. However, I think "the author's intention" is not as helpful as a true or lively or profound description in the writing. Just like Kawabata Yasunari's articles, they are long and short, but in the end they are not as shocking as the impression left by "The Dancing Girl of Izu". When reading the short stories in this book, compared with Gorky's The Human Trilogy, I always feel that the articles are always full of dirty things, while in the trilogy there are no such stains, but there are often things as shiny as gold. But it's still great. In all my reading experiences, in all my limited reading experiences, there are no writers as outstanding as Tolstoy, Chekhov, and Gorky.
Rating
Community(0)
Official(2)Scraped 6d ago
On the acupoint `}:7. }`L}`minus 0``ⅰer, Han氵, cow enters one pear and no one''Q: upper shape one; Ji; one} p:γ one i氵:冫:. The sound is faint, and the store contains information. : One. ! ! . , One. One'. . :
After reading short stories and novellas by Tolstoy, Chekhov, Turgenev ("Hunter's Notes"), and Gorky, I thought that long novels seemed to be a waste of energy. Why not just finish the story in a short and concise way? Why do it have to be so long? In particular, there are many long articles that have to be read to the second half or require reading the entire book to understand the depth. Even Tolstoy's "World and Peace" and "Anna", without a second reading, are only imprinted in my heart by many fragments, rather than the main theme of the entire novel. Of course, the second and third readings should have a deeper impact on the entire article. However, I think "the author's intention" is not as helpful as a true or lively or profound description in the writing. Just like Kawabata Yasunari's articles, they are long and short, but in the end they are not as shocking as the impression left by "The Dancing Girl of Izu". When reading the short stories in this book, compared with Gorky's The Human Trilogy, I always feel that the articles are always full of dirty things, while in the trilogy there are no such stains, but there are often things as shiny as gold. But it's still great. In all my reading experiences, in all my limited reading experiences, there are no writers as outstanding as Tolstoy, Chekhov, and Gorky.
