Tang Dynasty: a Loving Father and a Filial Son Cheng Chumo

Can membership be free? Want to see. . . More people will see it this way

What the hell? I can't stand it. I don't know what you are writing! ! ! !

Unfilial piety is one of the ten most unforgivable sins. The author doesn't know much about ancient times, so he just wants to express obscenity. Don't be poisoned to death.

Let's put aside the quality of the article. There is no connection between each chapter. I once suspected that it was deleted, but there is no sensitive content. There is a high probability of AI expansion.

After reading it, I didn't have any desire to read the introduction. Impeaching my father? In ancient times, being unfilial was a serious sin. No matter what the reason is, if you dare to impeach your biological father, dismiss him from office and never hire him, it is a minor offense, and you may be executed directly.

I really don't understand the role of the protagonist. As a general, his actual role is to take credit for other people's achievements in history without making any actual changes. The so-called changes are also written in terms of a hammer and a stick. The national-level strategic planning is unclear. It is unclear who will lead the troops where and what they will do. There is no detailed description of the route and tactics of the campaign. The battles are also written in a very cryptic way. One moment, the generals are fighting, but suddenly there is no news about the generals in the next scene, and the fight starts directly. As a royal censor, I thought he was going to tell the truth, remonstrate with others, and clear up the accumulated shortcomings. However, he turned out to be a toad. When others poked him, he jumped a little, and almost turned a blind eye to everything else. I really don't know what the role of the protagonist is, nothing has changed, nothing has changed, why write this protagonist?

It's totally wrong and completely messed up.