I'm More Than Just a Director
About This Novel
Reborn in 1999, Jiang Peian used folk tunes to grab the first pot of gold and got his ticket to the film and television industry. ... A gathering among directors. Host: This is Director Zhang, whose masterpieces are "My Father and Mother", "Alive" and "Heroes". This is director Cameron, whose masterpieces are "Terminator", "Titanic" and "Avatar". This is Director Chen, whose masterpieces are... It's Jiang Pei'an's turn. Host: This is Director Jiang, a folk tune artist whose early masterpiece is "An Angry Husband Fights a Shrewd Wife"... Huh? It seems like something strange has gotten in. Jiang Pei'an: Ahem, I'm more than just a director. ......Director? Producer? Arrangement and lyrics? Jiang Peian: I want it all! This is a nostalgic and interesting story...
What Readers Think
Rating
Community(0)
Official(20)Scraped 20d ago
Is it possible to write entertainment novels well? I only saw you looking for stars and media to denigrate the protagonists endlessly. Just do it twice. The novel was originally well written, but it became unreadable if it kept going dark.
Traveling through this point in time, I have occupied the Kung Fu Panda IP.
Kung Fu Panda was planned roughly in 2002, and filming began in Guilin in 2003. The protagonist could have made an animated short film or short comic in advance to seize the IP. Otherwise, Kung Fu Panda is obviously Chinese, and so are pandas, but Kung Fu Panda is from Hollywood.
Zhang Fengyi, who plays Luo Tuo Xiangzi in his true colors, is okay. Because his face is that kind of naive. The other roles he played are basically not memorable. The provincial party secretary in In the Name of the People also looks fake.
How can I put it, the author's level is too low, and good resources and good opportunities have been turned into a mess. Not to mention anything else, the Korean "Star You" wears all international famous brands, and the advertising expenses are very high. Just leave it here, bare board. Isn't this a waste of resources? Can't you copy Hollywood's many blockbusters? I also started playing TV series.
There is a problem with the rhythm and the plot is unreasonable
It's strange that after the movie was written and the plot was immediately published, there was no excess. The characters in it are also a bit strange. A movie that has made a company's profit for several years actually planned to take the protagonist as his younger brother. It's overthinking. There are so many fools in the entertainment industry. It's strange that someone was mediating the Zhao Ritian incident and insisted on blaming the protagonist. Is Lionsgate a philanthropist when the protagonist of Saw, which has a global box office of 170 million, gets more than 40 million US dollars in share? Investment is made by others, and issuance is issued by others. It would be outrageous to get the big share of the script and director.
The plot is too confusing. Many of the unclear plots are written in one stroke. The compositions written by elementary school students are better than yours.
There are four female characters in Taken, but you only have three. The singer thought she was the king, but what happened? [Emot=default,75/]
Poisoned to death, such a disgusting novel
For these two Lionsgate movies, there has never been any mention of the share ratio, right? Is it intentional or disdainful on the part of the author?
I basically listen to books, but just listening to "Tao" makes me annoyed.
Rating
Community(0)
Official(20)Scraped 20d ago
Is it possible to write entertainment novels well? I only saw you looking for stars and media to denigrate the protagonists endlessly. Just do it twice. The novel was originally well written, but it became unreadable if it kept going dark.
Traveling through this point in time, I have occupied the Kung Fu Panda IP.
Kung Fu Panda was planned roughly in 2002, and filming began in Guilin in 2003. The protagonist could have made an animated short film or short comic in advance to seize the IP. Otherwise, Kung Fu Panda is obviously Chinese, and so are pandas, but Kung Fu Panda is from Hollywood.
Zhang Fengyi, who plays Luo Tuo Xiangzi in his true colors, is okay. Because his face is that kind of naive. The other roles he played are basically not memorable. The provincial party secretary in In the Name of the People also looks fake.
How can I put it, the author's level is too low, and good resources and good opportunities have been turned into a mess. Not to mention anything else, the Korean "Star You" wears all international famous brands, and the advertising expenses are very high. Just leave it here, bare board. Isn't this a waste of resources? Can't you copy Hollywood's many blockbusters? I also started playing TV series.
There is a problem with the rhythm and the plot is unreasonable
It's strange that after the movie was written and the plot was immediately published, there was no excess. The characters in it are also a bit strange. A movie that has made a company's profit for several years actually planned to take the protagonist as his younger brother. It's overthinking. There are so many fools in the entertainment industry. It's strange that someone was mediating the Zhao Ritian incident and insisted on blaming the protagonist. Is Lionsgate a philanthropist when the protagonist of Saw, which has a global box office of 170 million, gets more than 40 million US dollars in share? Investment is made by others, and issuance is issued by others. It would be outrageous to get the big share of the script and director.
The plot is too confusing. Many of the unclear plots are written in one stroke. The compositions written by elementary school students are better than yours.
There are four female characters in Taken, but you only have three. The singer thought she was the king, but what happened? [Emot=default,75/]
Poisoned to death, such a disgusting novel
For these two Lionsgate movies, there has never been any mention of the share ratio, right? Is it intentional or disdainful on the part of the author?
I basically listen to books, but just listening to "Tao" makes me annoyed.
Featured in 3 Booklists
Official(3)
I've been reading a lot of entertainment articles lately, and this entry point into entertainment articles is a bit tricky. I am a scumbag, Kou is not a scumbag, the protagonist is undoubtedly a scumbag
This is a book with an unusual beginning, a director's essay. Starting with a folk tune, damn, old memories are attacking me again. But you can rest assured that this aspect does not occupy much space. It's just for some questions. I feel like the author wants to make a different start. The rhythm is okay, but there is no ink. The integration between the main plot and daily life is very smooth, with nearly two hundred chapters.
Plot:★★★☆☆ Writing style:★★★☆☆ Feelings:★★★☆☆ Character:★★★☆☆ Novelty:★★★☆☆ Total score:★★★☆☆ Comments: Entertainment article, dual heroines Gao Yuanyuan + Hu Jing, and a "thigh" Yu Feihong in his previous life. The male protagonist was reborn in 1999 and changed the fate of being blind in his previous life. He started by recording folk tunes from the Anhui area. He tried his best to localize "The Ghost Story" and gradually blossomed in the fields of directors, actors and even singers. The disadvantage is that it becomes more and more sluggish in the later period, which is also a common problem in entertainment movies.
You Might Also Like
Reborn Female General
Qianshan Tea Guest
Entertainment 1988
Wugong Bridge
China Entertainment: My Movies Have Taken the World by Storm
Dong Gechen
China Entertainment: Return to 2007
Daddy Salted Fish
The Literary Era Starting from 1979
Nanke Yiliang
Times Entertainment: My Good Sisters Are All over the World
Cold Fire Suddenly Arises
Return to 1983: My Literary Era
Said On Kawakami
Era, Starting from the Educated Youth in Northern Shaanxi
Handsome Boy Legend 007
1978 Movie Youth
Beautiful White Flowers
China Entertainment Started with Picking up the Head of Jade Girl
Sad And Distressed