Top Producer

Buddha said The wife in this life is the person you buried in the previous life; the favor you have not yet repaid. Your son in this life is your creditor in the past life; he comes to collect the unpaid debt. The daughter in this life, your lover in the past life; the unfinished love comes. The lovers in this life are the husband and wife in the previous life; they come to continue the unfinished fate. The beauties in this life are the brothers and sisters in the previous life; they come to exchange unfinished hearts. A person of great nobility in this life, a person of great kindness in the past life; come to collect the virtues accumulated in the previous life. The most evil person in this life, the most humiliated person in the previous life; come to avenge the heavy grievances of the previous life. It's not superstition, it's cause and effect. It's a fixed number

Crosstalk is a traditional art, which is different from entertainment literature. Copyright does not apply to everything. If you don't understand it, don't write about it. It's superfluous. If traditional arts such as cross talk are added to copyright disputes, they will really be lost. Some good books that were originally passed down by masters and apprentices have been passed down for several generations. The copyrights are more serious and cannot be clarified after a few days of wrangling. Many of them are deleted, modified and used. Are you trying to get the copyright for lyrics like "Bao Ma Gua", "Da Shang Shou", "Fu Shou Quan", or even Tai Ping lyrics? Even for other traditional arts such as Peking Opera repertoire, which was the most popular at the time, and how could you go to a concert alone and ask for copyright? What are people doing for that? Isn't it just to prevent this art from being lost, you should copyright it instead! If you don't understand, don't write!

I really don't understand what the author was thinking. When making Pleasant Goat and Big Big Wolf, he actually cut out the songs. There is still soul without the songs?

You have a system, but you have to go to a TV station and be controlled by others. Your system is a bit useless.

The more I watch it, the more disgusting it becomes. I like harem very much. . However, since he fell asleep, he abandoned them one by one, and even said confidently that he did not want to give up the forest for a tree. . . Can you please tell me? Although it is a novel, do you think some people will like this kind of protagonist setting?

It's a bit hard to read, and the plot feels incoherent. I feel like the author is thinking about it one after another. The plot is too jumpy and there is no layout and planning. Although life is full of variables, the life of the protagonist of the novel is a fixed number. The author should write the variables in the limited plan. Don't change the transition background easily. Even if you change it, it should develop towards a favorable situation. Let's talk about leaving. It would be too hasty to leave a TV station. It feels like the protagonist was forced to leave before the trend of his rise was established. This is already a failure in the readers' eyes. If you want to write an online article about human nature in depth, I advise you not to write entertainment articles. It is human nature to follow others' opinions, but no one is stupid enough to make enemies. What's more, the protagonist is still a rich second generation, which looks very awkward.

Why are there so many women? So much ambiguity. Chapter 256 Another one fell asleep

It's seriously illogical and so brainless.

After saying they rejected Han Ying, they got together again. Those who don't turn around eat again. How disgusting.

I have seen this in several novels. There is competition between excellent programs or movies and TV series being broadcast at the same time. It is exciting to watch, but from the perspective of the audience, it feels disgusting. We watch programs and TV just for entertainment. You put together good-looking ones, and then there are no successors of similar quality. Shouldn't TV movies be audience-centered?