Interstellar: I Became the Backer of a Boss Who Died Young

It's pretty good-looking, but the updates are a little bit slower... And there are so many fewer bits... I look forward to more updates!

I didn't like the witch Mu Xiyue a little bit when she first appeared, and it was weird, as if there was some strange power or system. I don't know if she has many roles, I hope she can be released soon

The world framework of this book is quite novel and does not feel cookie-cutter. So in terms of plot, I can give it five stars. However, there are many language problems. As far as language is concerned, I can only give it three stars, but generally speaking, it is not enough to cover up its shortcomings. Therefore, I take a positive attitude towards this book. I still give it five stars as an affirmation and encouragement to the author. I hope that the author can pay more attention to the creation of language in the future. The specific questions are as follows: (personal opinion) First, question marks are widely misused: question marks are not used when there are question words. Many times the sentences with question words are declarative sentences. It is really strange to add a question tone! Take an example from the article: "Yunjiu doesn't know where the Winged Beast will take her and Naitanzi?" This is a sentence that appears in a very early chapter. Obviously, a question mark should not be used here but a period, because this sentence itself is not a question, but a statement that Yun Jiu does not know about this matter. Perhaps because Chinese is our mother tongue, everyone doesn't have that deep experience with grammar, but everyone definitely has a deeper experience with English grammar. In English, this is the object clause in the noun clause, so isn't the question word "where" in this sentence the connecting adverb "where"? And do you add question marks when writing clauses? Obviously not. The second is the extensive use of words such as "very", "true" and "extremely good": this is just like the use of "very" and "many" throughout an English composition. It will make people feel that the person has a lack of vocabulary and a weak language foundation, which is a deduction. It does not mean that it cannot be used, but using it too much will affect the reading experience. Third, some of my personal opinions: The author particularly likes to use the word ending "Ma". Almost every question ends with "Ma". In most cases, I feel that using "Ma" is not appropriate, because using this word makes me feel like the speaker is acting coquettishly. For example, "Can we have barbecue tonight? " And " Let's have barbecue tonight, okay?" "Obviously the latter's tone is softer. In my opinion, it feels like coquettishness. Of course, this may have something to do with everyone's language habits. When I speak, I usually end the word with "?", Which means asking a very calm question; when I want to slightly weaken the sense of indifference and distance brought by "?", I will use "mo", which is shorter and softer in pronunciation, and less formal and alienated; and when I talk to someone who is particularly close or have something to ask for, I will use "m", which is usually "ok". Because in my opinion, this "ma" has a long sound, just like a child who sounds cute when he speaks with a long sound.

Yes, it's very interesting. I hope it can be updated continuously, preferably with more chapters.

First of all, give a five-star rating to show respect. This setting is more to my liking. My standard is to give five stars if there is one bright spot in the writing style, writing content, etc. After reading about 20 chapters recently, I clearly feel that one word has a particularly strong presence, and that is "really". There is a screenshot at the bottom (I don't know if it can be displayed), which is used as the search function in QQ Reading. The result is obvious. This word is a high-frequency word in this book, but should the word "really" really be a high-frequency word? Apparently not. For certain fixed uses, such as when expressing doubts (or making true or false judgments): "Is it true?" "Really or falsely?" "What he said is true." And so on, these necessary uses are of course understandable. And when it expresses degree: "This is really beautiful." "I really like this dress!" "I really can't stand it." (I just made up the sentence to give you an example. I didn't find any examples from the author's article here.) In this case, the use of this word needs to be considered. When applied to daily communication, it is normal to use this kind of colloquial vocabulary appropriately, but you must pay attention to the speaker's identity and personality. This is a bit complicated, so I won't go into details here. Some situations are not applicable, or not suitable for reuse: Example: "The ban must be broken. After all, the ban will be wrong for a long time. We really regret it and know that we were wrong. We should not be so unscrupulous and even destroy your home. We will compensate, we really will." Now is the time to express our attitude. Analysis: This sentence is quoted from a later chapter in the article, which roughly matches the location of the screenshot below. Using three "truths" in a row in a sentence inevitably seems wordy and seems to be a combination of words. Moreover, this sentence comes from the so-called "Eternal One", and the article roughly states that the Eternal One is the top powerful person in the universe and a person in a high position. Is this the level of words spoken by a person of this status? This is obviously unreasonable. Change (I wrote it blindly, if you mind, just ignore this, after all, my writing is not good, I just want to prove that the status of the word "true" is not irreplaceable): "Then the ban must be broken!" As if he felt that his tone seemed a bit presumptuous, the Eternal One quickly changed his tone, "Creator, look, after all this time has passed, the ban will also go wrong, right? Please believe that our repentance is definitely sincere!" After thinking about it, he felt that he said this It was too general and unconvincing, so he added: "We should not act so recklessly, or even be so arrogant as to destroy your home. We will definitely compensate you for this! Do you hope that you can calm down and spare our lives?" Now is the time to express your attitude. What does it mean to be humble? Nothing is lost until your life is gone!

Did the place where Yun Jiu originally lived also belong to an advanced civilization? Will she and her masters ever meet again? Finally, when will Mu Xiyue be offline? I hate such self-righteous people!

I couldn't stand it after reading some of it. To be honest, it was quite attractive, but I felt that there were some places where I couldn't read it smoothly. And in some words, nine out of ten sentences were repeating similar content. This is the first time I have had this idea after reading so many books. It seemed strange to read, as if it was saying one thing, as if it was explaining, but it was too nonsense. It might be better to proceed directly. For example, interacting with the Mori tribe requires sincerity and beautiful qualities. In fact, it is enough to explain it once, but I haven't read much and I am explaining it. I haven't read much and I am explaining it again. I'm really tired of spending too much explanation on things that don't need to be repeated. There are also typos. In some places, reading is just guessing. It would be better to review the article more carefully.

Update soon. Very nice. A very good novel. Highly recommended! ! ! ! !

It's very beautiful and the heroine hasn't worn it for a long time. It's novel. Now it's all soul wear. And after wearing it, I feel that the heroine is no longer her own person but has become the original owner.

ZThis kind of top priority, top priority, top priority, top priority