Super Zoo

It seems okay at first but not so good at the end. The author writes the protagonist as an animal lover, but what I always see is how the protagonist uses animals to make money. For example, in more than 200 chapters, he has a fox worshiping fairy. More than a million a year for pure entertainment is too little. The money for a religion is a lot but cannot be used casually. So I want to make a combination of entertainment and religion. I want to make a lot of money from believers and then make a profit for myself. This has no bottom line, but later it is also written that those foxes are very tired. Many people who have no bottom line may think this is nothing, but then there is another sentence that the money protagonist looks down on? Isn't it ridiculous to make money that hurts your conscience and then not care about the money? Let's think about it. The protagonist likes animals very much because he is an animal friend, but he never sees how he protects animals. He always uses animals to make money! The fox fairies all say that those foxes are very tired, but they still use them to make money! It is always said that the protagonist is not a good person but he is very principled (many novels are written like this), but what does it mean to make a profit by worshiping a fox fairy? Can you feel at ease when religion is involved? At the beginning of this novel, the author said in a chapter that a zoo in their real life was demolished, and then thought about this novel! This novel also always states that the protagonist loves animals, but it is always said that in fact it is always about how the protagonist uses animals to make money? So here comes the question, did you write this novel to care for animals or use animals to make money?

Well written! But in the middle period, more and more women are having affairs. There are more and more special animals, and there are foreshadowings everywhere, making the chess game bigger and bigger! So the author decisively failed to finish the work

Taotie, whoever can type this word will be recognized as his father, but whoever can't type will recognize me as his father.

Are you writing a novel? How can this be called a novel? It should be called a world masterpiece! ! !

The wicked dogs of the Zhatian Gang are here for a visit

Damn it, it's a genuine novel after all. Paying money to read the novel is not enough. It might as well be a pirated version online. You can also read Mao Yao Yao.

I just read this book and saw the book club but I still don't know who the main character's brother-in-law is. Can you tell me? Thank you kindhearted people

Originated in China. In 200 AD after Goguryeo surrendered to China, that is, in the Later Han Dynasty, the food of bream began to spread in China. It is said that it was introduced by the maritime peoples of Northeast Asia (Fuyu, Dongyu, Mahan, etc.). In the early days when Chinese characters were introduced to Japan, Japan added its own understanding of Chinese characters and replaced some Japanese foods with Chinese characters with similar or different meanings. Therefore, the Japanese "Suwuxi" became "鲲" and "Sashimi" became "鮨". In the Later Han Dynasty, small food made of rice, raw fish and sauce that could be eaten in one bite also appeared in Japan. It was much smaller than the Chinese bream. This is the ancestor of later Japanese sushi. At the same time, China's bream (fish sticks mixed with rice) can be regarded as the brother or neighbor of sushi. It's just that it is not widely circulated and popular nowadays. In 700 AD, that is, the Nara period, Japan's early small food was named sushi and was used as a festival food. Sushi has gradually become a daily food. In particular, some fishermen pickle rice balls with some vinegar, add some seafood or meat, press them into small pieces, and arrange them neatly in a small wooden box as food along the way. During the Kamakura Shogunate period, sushi had been widely spread and became a common item and a symbol of Japanese food culture.

Although I gave it good reviews, let's talk about the shortcomings. Overall, the book is quite positive, so I praised it well. However, the story of the zoo got twisted at the end and turned into human genes, and it was unfinished. I guess the author didn't have the energy to continue writing it. When I saw the unfinished ending, I felt sorry for the author. It was finally over. Otherwise, how could I edit it, and I wouldn't be able to go back to the zoo.

There are a lot of fragments. It seems uncomfortable if there are just a few things missing.