If You Were Asked to Be a Lawyer, Why Would Everyone Be the Defendant?

The story lines in recent chapters have been mixed, and I feel that they could be described in more detail to increase coherence. In addition, the content of the live broadcast is not bright, and the interaction between the audience and the protagonist is bland. For example, some hot issues can be raised, and I hope to improve it. Also, the character background of the protagonist is not clear enough, which may need to be taken into account later in the plot, but I suggest that the character of the protagonist be highlighted in the plot. Compared with similar novels, the character of the protagonist is currently a bit unclear. Finally, I hope the author will update it well and the novel will be a big hit. I will give you 7 recommendations with a monthly pass.

First of all, I won't give any grades. It's too subjective and I'll probably give you a low score. Overall, it looks very messy. In the early days, it was fine, either live broadcasting daily or only responsible for one case. Now, there are several cases mixed together. I will write about it here and write about it there. Moreover, the recent cases have made me feel quite aggrieved overall. The reason for the aggrievedness is actually very simple. The progress of several cases is basically due to the "weakness" of the male protagonist. The reason for this "weakness" lies in the incoherence of the plot and the speed of updating. It is obvious that the male protagonist is crushing the game, but it is all the male protagonist being "crushed". It is very strange. If the excitement comes later, then I can only say that it is not exciting, the excitement is too weak, and the feeling of suffocation is stronger. To be honest, when reading novels, one usually pursues a good male protagonist. The male protagonist in this novel is indeed systematic, but the overall feeling for me is very aggrieved. Even during the live broadcast, I felt a little bit like this. It is normal for the audience to cheat the anchor, but there should be a limit, otherwise it will be disgusting. I don't know whether the author wants to be funny or what, but I really didn't feel it. The audience actually felt very speechless when the live broadcast room was blocked several times.

If the author wants to write about a case, it is best to finish one case and then write the next one. Do not write several cases together, which looks messy.

The writing is too messy, all over the place.

I would like to ask which chapter follows the case in Chapter 6?

Where is the group? Where is the group?

Why did I become a member and now I have to top up money to buy reading coins before I can watch it?

Daily check-in will bring you a wave of experience.

The concept is very clever, and a lot of suspense is set up in the book, waiting to be solved one by one, it is worth savoring

I only watched the free ones, I'll save the rest first, I hope the rest won't be so messy