Deng Guangming's History of Governance Series
About This Novel
The author is the most famous contemporary historian of the Song, Liao and Jin Dynasties. His knowledge is not limited to the narrow field of history, but integrates literature, history and philosophy, and has contributed to all aspects of the history of the Song, Liao and Jin Dynasties. The titles of "Deng Guangming's History of Governance Collection" are personally selected by the author. According to the content of the articles, they are generally prefaced by institutional history, political history, Neo-Confucianism, Ci studies, historical materials, characters, etc. Some of the author's unique insights and most specific research skills on the history of Song, Liao and Jin are presented after careful revision. Among them are long papers such as "The Recruitment System of the Northern Song Dynasty and its Relationship with the Weakness, Poverty and Agricultural Production of the Time", as well as preface texts such as "\u003CSong Historian Official Records Examination\u003E Preface and Examples" and "The High Development of Song Dynasty Culture and the Cultural Policy of the Song Dynasty - \u003CPreface to the Draft of the Cultural History of the Northern Song Dynasty\u003E".
What Readers Think
Rating
Community(0)
Official(1)Scraped 17d ago
It is worthy of being written by historians.
After reading books written by big names in the field of history over the past few years, I realized how unsightly the things written by Internet shit scientists are. Internet scholars seem to cite a bunch of historical materials, but they only look for ones that are beneficial to themselves, and rarely consider the source of historical materials and the authenticity of historical materials. The characteristic is: it seems to quote a bunch of historical materials, but the actual source of historical materials is only one.
Rating
Community(0)
Official(1)Scraped 17d ago
It is worthy of being written by historians.
After reading books written by big names in the field of history over the past few years, I realized how unsightly the things written by Internet shit scientists are. Internet scholars seem to cite a bunch of historical materials, but they only look for ones that are beneficial to themselves, and rarely consider the source of historical materials and the authenticity of historical materials. The characteristic is: it seems to quote a bunch of historical materials, but the actual source of historical materials is only one.
