Paris Peace Conference (history of the Eastern World)
by (ireland) Emile Joseph Dillon
About This Novel
"The Paris Peace Conference" is an academic masterpiece that studies the geopolitics after World War I. It is the representative work of Dr. Emile Joseph Dillon, a journalist and scholar who was invited to the Paris Peace Conference. It profoundly analyzes the historical contradictions and practical disputes between victorious and defeated countries, between the victorious and powerful countries and the victorious and weak countries, and between the forces that insist on colonialism and those that support national liberation. What were the political, economic and social conditions of various countries before and after the Paris Peace Conference? What principles of censorship and secrecy were pursued at the Paris Peace Conference? How did outstanding politicians who came forward to solve pressing post-war problems in simple ways? What demands did the various small countries participating in the war make? How did the representatives of the big countries, especially the giants who controlled the Paris Peace Conference, resolve the demands of the small countries? What embarrassing situation does the restored Poland face? Why did the Italian representative return disappointed? How did Japan use diplomatic means to seize German rights and interests in Shandong, China? How did the Paris Peace Conference treat Russia, which withdrew from the war midway? How did Thomas Woodrow Wilson go from being admired to being a disappointment? What efforts and compromises did Thomas Woodrow Wilson make in order to realize his ideals? Why are the Peace with the Enemy and the "Covenant of the Alliance" incompatible with each other and so criticized? This book can be called a map of various political situations in various countries. It reveals between the lines that "inequality has always existed throughout the Paris Peace Conference", allowing readers to deeply understand the cruel truth that "there are no eternal enemies, only eternal interests" and "weak countries have no diplomacy".
What Readers Think
Rating
Community(0)
Rating
Community(0)
