Detective Log

On a new book list, about one-third are Douluo fanfics, which feels really annoying.

A big improvement over the previous book is that the content is more professional and contains more useful information. Moreover, the whole life situation is very similar to that of the police. But which city has so many cases? Usually there is not even one murder case a year. Hahaha, the novel is still wonderful. There is one place where I can rewrite it, and refer to Higashino Keigo's reasoning book. This book often touches on the motive of murder. The writing is not detailed, but the reasoning process is okay. Maybe it's because this is an online novel after all, and it mainly focuses on highlighting the description of the male protagonist without family members, suspects, civilians, or other staff members. It's easy to see that the effect is there, and the depth can be further improved. Peace

Generally speaking, it's a very old routine. In addition, the whole book is plagiarized from National Forensic Medicine. Unfortunately, the author is not good at it and does not get three points.

There are eight comments, but there are a few at the top, and there are no ratings yet. How many monthly votes have been paid?

1: I feel that the protagonist develops too quickly. Others may not be able to master a single skill in a lifetime, but the protagonist only used it in a few days. A few times faster is a genius, a few dozen times faster is a genius, what is it called thousands of times or tens of thousands of times faster? 2: I feel that the protagonist's abilities and case arrangements are too "deliberate". Every time the protagonist acquires some ability, similar cases will occur. In this regard, the police novels next door are better. The protagonist's initial skills are only useful after a few cases, and the protagonist is only an assistant in solving the case. The key to solving the case is not discovered and analyzed by the protagonist. However, the shortcomings are also obvious. Every time The analysis is regarded as truth rather than possibility and feasibility, so I was persuaded to quit (the novel next door was diverted because of this, but the shortcomings of that novel were greater, so I came back, but I don't want the advantages of every novel to rely on peers). 3: The cases are basically not original. Many of the cases are either adapted from reality or adapted from TV series and novels. 4: This is the only police novel that I have paid to read. I used to subscribe automatically, but now it has been cancelled, which is a bit disappointing. I have paid readings here at Qidian. I also voted for the monthly vote and all the recommendation votes at the starting point. To be honest, it didn't feel worth it after seeing the end.

At first it looked okay and quite attractive, but when I saw the cases one by one later, I sighed: Is society so unsafe? A little annoyed! Then, today I saw the same chapter repeated... Dizzy! This is the rhythm that makes me give up!

Can you update it faster? It's too slow.

"Criminal Police Diary" has obvious logical and narrative shortcomings in case presentation, making it difficult to meet the basic requirements for rigor in criminal investigation themes. The handling of the investigation of the case was particularly rough. The process of solving the case in the later period was simplified to almost perfunctory, and there was no reasonable preparation for the clues. The plot was often advanced in an "airborne without warning" method, which was completely divorced from the basic logic of "visiting, arranging, and corroborating evidence" in real investigation. The more prominent problem is the separation of clues and conclusions - the key clues that were emphasized in the early stage have no connection when the case is finally solved, forming a logical gap. For example, the remnants of the scene that were focused on in a certain case were not related to the physical evidence in the final solution, making the foreshadowing meaningless. The overall narrative is too routine and violates the basic principle of "complete presentation from front to back" of criminal cases. The background of the case is vague, and the investigation process omits key reasoning and progressive links. There is an obvious logical jump from the discovery of clues to the identification of the suspect, which cannot present a "snatching" investigation quality; the ending of the case is also often hasty, neither clearly explaining the basis for the judgment nor the necessary presentation of the impact on the case, failing to build a complete closed loop of the story. If we can return to the core logic of criminal investigation narrative, make the laying of clues more relevant and authentic, and improve the case chain according to the structure of "background explanation-investigation advancement-result closed loop", even if conventional case themes are used, the credibility and visibility of the content can be improved.

Plagiarizing the National Medical Examiner is too serious!

Why is there no Goldfinger later? What is the mission of Goldfinger?